Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
Diversity of Protists II01:27

Diversity of Protists II

Alveolates are a group of organisms recognized by the presence of alveoli, which are cytoplasmic sacs located beneath the cell membrane. While their function remains uncertain, alveoli may help regulate water balance by controlling how much water enters and leaves the cell. In dinoflagellates, these structures may serve as armor plates. There are three major types of alveolates: ciliates, which move using cilia; dinoflagellates, which use flagella for movement; and apicomplexans, which are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A tiger is not always a satyr: role of male mating behaviour in interspecific mating interactions between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.

Parasites & vectors·2026
Same author

Pickpocket315 affects male mating behavior in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2025
Same author

Phenotypic variation in populations of the mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti, and implications for predicting the effects of temperature and climate change on dengue transmission.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2025
Same author

Wastewater surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza in a dynamic university community: understanding how wastewater measurements correspond to reported cases.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Nonnative tree invaders lead to declines in native tree species richness.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Modelling the effects of diurnal temperature variation on malaria infection dynamics in mosquitoes.

Communications biology·2025
Same journal

The second Cryptosporidium meeting: Edinburgh's parasite deep dive.

Trends in parasitology·2026
Same journal

Evolution of generalism under Muller's ratchet.

Trends in parasitology·2026
Same journal

Next generation in parasitology 2026: Connecting young parasitologists across Europe.

Trends in parasitology·2026
Same journal

Disrupted barriers, evolved risks: toward precision One Health in arthropod allergy.

Trends in parasitology·2026
Same journal

Unveiling malaria history using ancient genomes.

Trends in parasitology·2026
Same journal

Tuft cells awaken Th2 recall responses.

Trends in parasitology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Standard Membrane Feeding Assay for the Detection of Plasmodium falciparum Infection in Anopheles Mosquito Vectors
05:28

Standard Membrane Feeding Assay for the Detection of Plasmodium falciparum Infection in Anopheles Mosquito Vectors

Published on: May 12, 2022

Do malaria parasites manipulate mosquitoes?

Lauren J Cator1, Penelope A Lynch, Andrew F Read

  • 1Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. luc25@psu.edu

Trends in Parasitology
|October 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Malaria parasites may change mosquito behavior to boost transmission. Understanding this parasite manipulation is crucial for effective malaria control strategies and epidemiological models.

More Related Videos

Building a Better Mosquito: Identifying the Genes Enabling Malaria and Dengue Fever Resistance in A. gambiae and A. aegypti Mosquitoes
15:03

Building a Better Mosquito: Identifying the Genes Enabling Malaria and Dengue Fever Resistance in A. gambiae and A. aegypti Mosquitoes

Published on: July 4, 2007

Protocol for Production of a Genetic Cross of the Rodent Malaria Parasites
13:39

Protocol for Production of a Genetic Cross of the Rodent Malaria Parasites

Published on: January 3, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Standard Membrane Feeding Assay for the Detection of Plasmodium falciparum Infection in Anopheles Mosquito Vectors
05:28

Standard Membrane Feeding Assay for the Detection of Plasmodium falciparum Infection in Anopheles Mosquito Vectors

Published on: May 12, 2022

Building a Better Mosquito: Identifying the Genes Enabling Malaria and Dengue Fever Resistance in A. gambiae and A. aegypti Mosquitoes
15:03

Building a Better Mosquito: Identifying the Genes Enabling Malaria and Dengue Fever Resistance in A. gambiae and A. aegypti Mosquitoes

Published on: July 4, 2007

Protocol for Production of a Genetic Cross of the Rodent Malaria Parasites
13:39

Protocol for Production of a Genetic Cross of the Rodent Malaria Parasites

Published on: January 3, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Parasitology
  • Vector biology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Malaria parasites are hypothesized to manipulate mosquito vector behavior to enhance transmission.
  • This behavioral manipulation is often overlooked in epidemiological models and control strategies.
  • A gap exists between theoretical manipulation and demonstrated field transmission.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and discuss empirical evidence for parasite-induced behavioral alteration in mosquitoes.
  • To explore the potential significance of this manipulation for malaria transmission dynamics.
  • To suggest pathways for translating this hypothesis into practical malaria control applications.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of existing empirical evidence.
  • Discussion of the implications of behavioral manipulation for transmission.
  • Exploration of future research directions and control strategies.

Main Results:

  • Empirical evidence supports the hypothesis that malaria parasites alter mosquito behavior.
  • The precise link between altered behavior and actual field transmission requires further quantification.
  • Current control measures do not typically account for parasite-driven behavioral changes.

Conclusions:

  • Parasite manipulation of vector behavior is a plausible factor in malaria transmission.
  • Further research is needed to quantify this effect in field settings.
  • Integrating knowledge of behavioral manipulation could lead to novel malaria control interventions.