Related Experiment Videos
Measuring adverse events and levels of harm in pediatric inpatients with the Global Trigger Tool
Eric S Kirkendall1, Elizabeth Kloppenborg, James Papp
1Division of Hospital Medicine, Medical Director of Clinical Decision Support, Information Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. eric.kirkendall@cchmc.org
Insights
The Global Trigger Tool (GTT) effectively identified patient harm in a pediatric setting, revealing higher harm rates than previously reported. This tool aids in measuring and understanding adverse events in pediatric care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric patient safety
- Healthcare quality improvement
- Medical error detection
Background:
- Patient safety is a critical concern in pediatric healthcare.
- Existing trigger tools may not fully capture harm in pediatric populations.
- The Global Trigger Tool (GTT) is a validated method for identifying adverse events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the Global Trigger Tool's (GTT) effectiveness in a pediatric inpatient setting.
- To determine the rate of patient harm and compare it with existing benchmarks.
- To analyze the types and severity of identified adverse events.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 240 random inpatient records over 12 months.
- Utilized 53 predefined safety triggers to identify potential adverse events.
- Physician review and harm level assignment for confirmed adverse events.
Main Results:
- Identified 404 triggers and 88 adverse events (36.7 per 100 admissions).
- 25.8% of patients experienced at least one adverse event.
- Most events caused temporary harm; two required life-sustaining intervention.
Conclusions:
- The GTT is a valuable tool for detecting patient harm in pediatric care.
- Observed harm rates were 2-3 times higher than previously published pediatric rates.
- Tailoring the GTT for pediatric-specific issues may enhance its accuracy.
Objectives:
To evaluate and characterize the Global Trigger Tool's (GTT's) utility in a pediatric population; to measure the rate of harm at our institution and compare it with previously established trigger tools and benchmark rates; and to describe the distribution of harm of the detected events.
Methods:
Per the GTT methodology, 240 random inpatient charts were retrospectively reviewed over a 12-month pilot period for the presence of 53 predefined safety triggers. When triggers were detected, the reviewers investigated the chart more thoroughly to decide whether an adverse event occurred. Agreement with a physician reviewer was then reached, and a level of harm was assigned.
Results:
A total of 404 triggers were detected (1.7 triggers per patient), and 88 adverse events were identified. Rates of 36.7 adverse events per 100 admissions and 76.3 adverse events per 1000 patient-days were calculated. Sixty-two patients (25.8%) had at least 1 adverse event during their hospitalization, and 18 (7.5%) had >1 event identified. Three-quarters of the events were category E (temporary harm). Two events required intervention to sustain life (category H). Two of the 6 trigger modules identified 95% of the adverse events.
Conclusions:
The GTT demonstrated utility in the pediatric inpatient setting. With the use of the trigger tool, we identified a rate of harm 2 to 3 times higher than previously published pediatric rates. Modifications to the trigger tool to address pediatric-specific issues could increase the test characteristics of the tool.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors