Murphy's law-if anything can go wrong, it will: Problems in phage electron microscopy

Hans-W Ackermann1, Kenneth L Tiekotter

  • 1Department of Microbiology; Immunology and Infectiology; Faculty of Medicine; Laval University; Quebec, QC, Canada.

Bacteriophage
|October 11, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Bacteriophage electron microscopy quality has declined since the 1980s due to issues like poor contrast and misidentification of viral particles. Human error is the primary cause, necessitating stricter journal reviews for accurate scientific reporting.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Microscopy techniques
  • Scientific imaging

Background:

  • Bacteriophage electron microscopy quality has declined since the 1980s.
  • This decline correlates with the adoption of digital electron microscopes and a potential decrease in expert oversight.
  • Poor contrast and artifact misinterpretation are significant issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the causes of declining quality in bacteriophage electron microscopy.
  • To highlight common errors and their impact on viral particle identification.
  • To emphasize the role of human factors and journal standards in maintaining microscopy quality.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of trends in bacteriophage electron microscopy quality.
  • Identification of common technical and interpretative errors.
  • Review of the impact of digital microscopy and operator training.

Main Results:

  • A noticeable decline in bacteriophage electron microscopy quality since the 1980s.
  • Frequent issues include poor contrast, unrecognized positive staining artifacts, and misdiagnosis of non-viral materials.
  • Digital electron microscopes are often operated without magnification control, contributing to errors.
  • Human failure is identified as the main cause of these problems.

Conclusions:

  • The quality of bacteriophage electron microscopy is compromised by technical and interpretative errors, largely due to human factors.
  • Stricter standards in sample preparation, image acquisition, and interpretation are crucial.
  • Journals play a vital role in quality control through rigorous peer review to prevent the publication of substandard work.