Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Following Cell-fate in E. coli After Infection by Phage Lambda
Published on: October 14, 2011
Murphy's law-if anything can go wrong, it will: Problems in phage electron microscopy
Hans-W Ackermann1, Kenneth L Tiekotter
1Department of Microbiology; Immunology and Infectiology; Faculty of Medicine; Laval University; Quebec, QC, Canada.
Abstract:
The quality of bacteriophage electron microscopy appears to be on a downward course since the 1980s. This coincides with the introduction of digital electron microscopes and a general lowering of standards, possibly due to the disappearance of several world-class electron microscopists The most important problem seems to be poor contrast. Positive staining is frequently not recognized as an undesirable artifact. Phage parts, bacterial debris, and aberrant or damaged phage particles may be misdiagnosed as bacterial viruses. Digital electron microscopes often seem to be operated without magnification control because this is difficult and inconvenient. In summary, most phage electron microscopy problems may be attributed to human failure. Journals are a last-ditch defense and have a heavy responsibility in selecting competent reviewers and rejecting, or not, unsatisfactory articles.
Insights
Bacteriophage electron microscopy quality has declined since the 1980s due to issues like poor contrast and misidentification of viral particles. Human error is the primary cause, necessitating stricter journal reviews for accurate scientific reporting.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Microscopy techniques
- Scientific imaging
Background:
- Bacteriophage electron microscopy quality has declined since the 1980s.
- This decline correlates with the adoption of digital electron microscopes and a potential decrease in expert oversight.
- Poor contrast and artifact misinterpretation are significant issues.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the causes of declining quality in bacteriophage electron microscopy.
- To highlight common errors and their impact on viral particle identification.
- To emphasize the role of human factors and journal standards in maintaining microscopy quality.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of trends in bacteriophage electron microscopy quality.
- Identification of common technical and interpretative errors.
- Review of the impact of digital microscopy and operator training.
Main Results:
- A noticeable decline in bacteriophage electron microscopy quality since the 1980s.
- Frequent issues include poor contrast, unrecognized positive staining artifacts, and misdiagnosis of non-viral materials.
- Digital electron microscopes are often operated without magnification control, contributing to errors.
- Human failure is identified as the main cause of these problems.
Conclusions:
- The quality of bacteriophage electron microscopy is compromised by technical and interpretative errors, largely due to human factors.
- Stricter standards in sample preparation, image acquisition, and interpretation are crucial.
- Journals play a vital role in quality control through rigorous peer review to prevent the publication of substandard work.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Transmission Electron Microscopy
DNA Bacteriophages

