Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Drug Repurposing Hypothesis Generation Using the "RE:fine Drugs" System
Published on: December 11, 2016
Commentary: How the debate about comparative effectiveness research should impact the future of clinical trials
1Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. lauerm@nhlbi.nih.gov
Abstract:
Comparative effectiveness research represents the kind of research that arguably more directly affects clinical practice and policy. It includes observational studies, clinical trials, and systematic syntheses of existing literature. In this commentary, I argue for the ongoing and critical role of randomization in comparative effectiveness, noting the key differences between practical and explanatory trials.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Bioequivalence: Overview
