Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Flap-off epi-LASIK versus automated epithelial brush in PRK: a prospective comparison study of pain and
M Teresa Magone1, Andrew T Engle, Thu-Ha Easter
1Department of Ophthalmology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
Purpose:
To compare the effect of flap-off epi-LASIK versus automated brush epithelial removal on pain and wound healing in low myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
Methods:
In this prospective intraindividual study 60 patients received surface ablation in each eye. Epithelial removal was performed by an automated brush technique in one eye (brush group) and epi-LASIK with flap removal (flap-off group) in the fellow eye. The epithelial defect size was measured daily after surgery until both eyes were reepithelialized. Postoperative pain on a scale from 0 to 6 and topical and oral analgesic medication use was recorded until the bandage contact lens was removed.
Results:
The flap-off group had significantly less postoperative pain on days 1 (P=.0003), 2 (P=.0001), 3 (P<.0001), and 4 (P<.0001) compared to the brush group. However, the average difference in pain scores between groups was only 0.33 points out of 6. No difference was noted in the normalized overall percentage rate of healing over the first 4 days in the flap-off group (5.41±1.39%/hour) compared to the brush group (5.42±1.94%/hour) (P=.97).
Conclusions:
The flap-off group showed a statistically but not clinically significant advantage over the brush group in pain scores. However, no difference was noted in the percentage rate of epithelial healing time between the two groups.
