Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Preliminary examination of symptom validity in veterans using the Rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2026

Same author

Examination of WAIS-5 naming speed quantity within a multidisciplinary dementia clinic.

Applied neuropsychology. Adult·2026

Same author

Within-Person Score Distribution Measures as Performance Validity Indicators in Service Members and Veterans with and without History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2025

Same author

The inventory of problems-29 (IOP-29) in a US clinical sample.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2025

Same author

Derivation of embedded symptom validity indicators for the Brief Symptom Inventory-18.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2025

Same author

Objective Versus Subjective Cognitive Status Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Psychological Factors.

The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

Derivation of an embedded Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test performance validity indicator.

Jeremy J Davis¹, Scott R Millis, Bradley N Axelrod

¹University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. jeremy.davis@hsc.utah.edu

The Clinical Neuropsychologist

|October 19, 2012

Summary

This study developed a new performance validity indicator for the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) to detect invalid test results in traumatic brain injury patients. The indicator showed high accuracy in distinguishing between valid and invalid performances.

More Related Videos

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery

Published on: October 11, 2010

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

Area of Science:

Neuropsychology
Cognitive Assessment
Psychometrics

Background:

Performance validity testing (PVT) is crucial in neuropsychological assessments.
The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) is widely used but lacks embedded validity indicators.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can affect performance validity.

Purpose of the Study:

To derive and validate an embedded performance validity indicator for the AVLT.
To assess the indicator's ability to discriminate between individuals with and without valid performance on the AVLT.
To improve the accuracy of AVLT interpretation in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

Utilized an archival dataset of 167 participants (aged 20-65) with reported TBI.
Employed Bayesian model averaging to identify optimal AVLT variables for group discrimination.
Applied logistic regression to develop and evaluate the performance validity index.

Main Results:

The optimal combination of AVLT variables included Total Learning and Recognition raw scores.
The derived AVLT performance validity index demonstrated excellent discrimination (Area Under the Curve = 0.85).
The index achieved a sensitivity of 0.55 and a specificity of 0.91.

Conclusions:

An embedded AVLT performance validity index can effectively identify invalid test performance.
The index shows promise for enhancing the reliability of AVLT results in TBI populations.
Further research and cross-validation are recommended before clinical implementation.