Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Deviatoric and hydrostatic mode interaction in hard and soft tissue.

S C Cowin1

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, City College of CUNY, New York 10031.

Journal of Biomechanics
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tortuosity and the Averaging of Microvelocity Fields in Poroelasticity.

Journal of applied mechanics·2014
Same author

Dynamic permeability of the lacunar-canalicular system in human cortical bone.

Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology·2013
Same author

Analytical basis for the determination of the lacunar-canalicular permeability of bone using cyclic loading.

Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology·2011
Same author

Perspectives on biological growth and remodeling.

Journal of the mechanics and physics of solids·2011
Same author

Topological optimization in hip prosthesis design.

Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology·2009
Same author

Structural changes in living tissues.

Meccanica·2007
Same journal

Regional mechanical differences in hamstring muscles after removal of surrounding connective tissue.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

A novel knee joint laxity measurement device in mice.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Influence of iliofemoral ligament laxity on hip joint contact forces during gait.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Associations of sagittal spinal alignment with shear wave velocity, thickness, and echo intensity of muscles attached to the spine and pelvis in healthy women.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

The gait lab effect: symmetry restoration strategy after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is different in natural environments than the gait laboratory.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Mediolateral trunk control, rather than temporal gait control, is associated with treadmill walking adaptation in healthy older adults.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
See all related articles

Anisotropic tissues exhibit coupled mechanical behaviors, meaning standard stress analysis methods like von Mises effective stress are unsuitable. This interaction challenges how we understand tissue response to mechanical stimuli.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Materials Science
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Many biological tissues, both hard and soft, exhibit anisotropic material symmetry.
  • Understanding tissue mechanics is crucial for fields like regenerative medicine and orthopedics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interaction between deviatoric and hydrostatic stress modes in anisotropic elastic materials.
  • To evaluate the appropriateness of standard stress analysis concepts for anisotropic biological tissues.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of coupled deviatoric and hydrostatic stress modes in anisotropic elasticity.
  • Comparison with the non-interactive modes in isotropic materials.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • In general anisotropic materials, deviatoric and hydrostatic stress modes interact.
  • This interaction renders concepts like von Mises effective stress inappropriate for anisotropic tissues.
  • The findings have implications for computational stress analysis in hard and soft tissues.

    • Conclusions:

    • The mode coupling in anisotropic tissues necessitates a re-evaluation of stress analysis methods.
    • This interaction raises fundamental questions about whether tissues respond to stress, strain, or strain energy.
    • Further research is needed to understand the primary stimuli for biological tissue responses.