Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

10:38
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Temporal orienting of attention is interfered by concurrent working memory updating
Mariagrazia Capizzi1, Angel Correa, Daniel Sanabria
1Departamento de Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Granada, Spain. mgcapizzi@ugr.es
Neuropsychologia
|October 23, 2012
Summary
Performing a concurrent working memory task selectively disrupts neural mechanisms of temporal orienting of attention, while preserving those for sequential effects. Electrophysiological findings reveal specific interference with early attention-related brain potentials.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Psychology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Temporal orienting of attention allows anticipation of events based on timing cues.
- Working memory tasks can interfere with attentional processes.
- Previous research indicated behavioral dissociation between temporal orienting and sequential effects under dual-task conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the behavioral dissociation between temporal orienting and sequential effects during concurrent working memory load.
- To examine event-related potential (ERP) differences between single-task and dual-task performance.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed temporal orienting tasks under single-task and dual-task conditions (concurrent working memory).
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded, focusing on cue-locked and target-locked components.
- Behavioral measures of temporal orienting and sequential effects were collected.
Main Results:
- Behavioral results replicated previous findings: temporal orienting was impaired, while sequential effects were preserved under dual-task conditions.
- Single-task ERPs showed modulations of contingent negative variation (CNV), N2, and P3 by temporal orienting and sequential effects.
- Dual-task performance abolished CNV, N2, and P3 modulations related to temporal orienting, but early target-locked P1/N1 modulations for sequential effects persisted.
Conclusions:
- Concurrent working memory tasks selectively interfere with neural correlates of temporal orienting of attention.
- Sequential effects show greater neural resilience to working memory load, particularly at early sensory processing stages.
- Electrophysiological data provide direct neural evidence for the selective impact of cognitive load on distinct attentional control mechanisms.

