Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Placement in a Neonatal Patient Simulator Using a Non-Inflatable Supraglottic Airway (SGA)
Published on: July 14, 2023
Respiratory protection during simulated emergency pediatric life support: a randomized, controlled, crossover study
Jan Schumacher1, Stuart A Gray, Sophie Michel
1King's College, London, UK. jan.schumacher@kcl.ac.uk
Insights
Conventional air-purifying respirators (APRs) offered better communication and dexterity during simulated pediatric emergencies compared to powered air-purifying respirator-hoods (PAPRs). However, PAPRs reduced heat buildup, though both respirator types impacted treatment times.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Respiratory Protection
- Pediatric Resuscitation
Background:
- Effective respiratory protection is crucial for medical first responders during emergency pediatric life support (EPLS) for children with transmissible respiratory diseases.
- Conventional air-purifying respirators (APRs) and powered air-purifying respirator-hoods (PAPRs) may impact pediatric resuscitation differently, necessitating evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of APRs versus PAPR-hoods during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenarios.
- To compare treatment times and wearer comfort between different respiratory protection methods.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, controlled, crossover study design was employed.
- Sixteen paramedics performed a standardized EPLS scenario in an ambulance, either unprotected, with a conventional APR, or with a PAPR-hood.
- Treatment times and wearer comfort were recorded and compared across conditions.
Main Results:
- All participants completed the simulated treatments without adverse events.
- Communication, dexterity, and mobility were rated significantly better with APRs.
- Heat buildup was significantly less with PAPR-hoods.
- Treatment times did not significantly differ from the control for APRs, but were significantly longer for PAPR-hoods.
Conclusions:
- Conventional APRs demonstrated a trend towards better treatment times compared to PAPR-hoods in simulated pediatric resuscitation.
- Participants found mobility, communication, and dexterity superior with the tight-fitting APR system over the loose-fitting PAPR-hood.
Introduction:
Emergency pediatric life support (EPLS) of children infected with transmissible respiratory diseases requires adequate respiratory protection for medical first responders. Conventional air-purifying respirators (APR) and modern loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirator-hoods (PAPR-hood) may have a different impact during pediatric resuscitation and therefore require evaluation.
Objective:
This study investigated the influence of APRs and PAPR-hoods during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Methods:
Study design was a randomized, controlled, crossover study. Sixteen paramedics carried out a standardized EPLS scenario inside an ambulance, either unprotected (control) or wearing a conventional APR or a PAPR-hood. Treatment times and wearer comfort were determined and compared.
Results:
All paramedics completed the treatment objectives of the study arms without adverse events. Study subjects reported that communication, dexterity and mobility were significantly better in the APR group, whereas the heat-build-up was significantly less in the PAPR-hood group. Treatment times compared to the control group did not significantly differ for the APR group but did with the PAPR-hood group (261±12 seconds for the controls, 275±9 seconds for the conventional APR and 286±13 seconds for the PAPR-hood group, P < .05.
Conclusions:
APRs showed a trend to better treatment times compared to PAPR-hoods during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Study participants rated mobility, ease of communication and dexterity with the tight-fitting APR system significantly better compared to the loose-fitting PAPR-hood.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Administering Oxygen by Mask
Administering oxygen by mask is a common nursing intervention that provides supplemental oxygen to patients with respiratory distress or chronic lung conditions. This procedure involves delivering oxygen at a specified rate through a face mask connected to an oxygen source.
Equipment
The equipment necessary for this procedure includes:
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...