Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

mTORC1 signaling requires proteasomal function and the involvement of CUL4-DDB1 ubiquitin E3 ligase.

Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)·2008
Same author

Prospective study of liver transplant recipients with HCV infection: evidence for a causal relationship between HCV and insulin resistance.

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society·2008
Same author

Quantitative gel electrophoresis: sources of variation.

Journal of proteome research·2008
Same author

Evidence that the Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein, an early sensor of double-strand DNA breaks (DSB), is involved in HIV-1 post-integration repair by recruiting the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated kinase in a process similar to, but distinct from, cellular DSB repair.

Virology journal·2008
Same author

[Inhibitory effects of Qushi Huayu Decoction on fatty deposition and tumor necrosis factor alpha secretion in HepG2 cells induced by free fatty acid].

Zhongguo Zhong xi yi jie he za zhi Zhongguo Zhongxiyi jiehe zazhi = Chinese journal of integrated traditional and Western medicine·2008
Same author

Bioactive polybrominated diphenyl ethers from the marine sponge Dysidea sp.

Journal of natural products·2008

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Empirical bayesian selection of hypothesis testing procedures for analysis of sequence count expression data.

Stanley B Pounds1, Cuilan L Gao, Hui Zhang

  • 1St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.

Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology
|October 30, 2012
PubMed
Summary

New methods improve gene expression analysis by selecting appropriate statistical tests for each gene. These empirical Bayesian probability (EBP)-based procedures accurately identify overdispersion, enhancing differential expression analysis results.

More Related Videos

Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens
09:14

Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens

Published on: June 28, 2018

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types
12:39

A Novel Bayesian Change-point Algorithm for Genome-wide Analysis of Diverse ChIPseq Data Types

Published on: December 10, 2012

Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens
09:14

Informatic Analysis of Sequence Data from Batch Yeast 2-Hybrid Screens

Published on: June 28, 2018

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Differential expression analysis requires numerous hypothesis tests for gene expression count data.
  • Standard methods often fail due to unmet assumptions across many genes.
  • Selecting appropriate statistical tests per gene is crucial for accurate analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce novel empirical Bayesian probability (EBP)-based procedures for selecting hypothesis-testing methods in gene expression analysis.
  • To simultaneously evaluate Poisson distribution assumptions and manage multiple testing.
  • To improve the accuracy of differential expression analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Generalized previous work to develop two new EBP-based procedures.
  • Utilized estimates of EBP of overdispersion to select between Poisson likelihood ratio and quasi-likelihood tests.
  • Incorporated computational evaluation of assumptions for each gene.

Main Results:

  • The new EBP-based procedures effectively select appropriate tests based on count data characteristics (Poisson vs. overdispersed).
  • Demonstrated superior performance compared to existing methods in simulation studies.
  • Successfully applied the methods to a real-data analysis example.

Conclusions:

  • The developed EBP-based procedures offer a robust framework for differential expression analysis.
  • These methods enhance accuracy by appropriately selecting statistical tests for individual genes.
  • The framework has potential for further generalization and performance enhancement.