Influences of microbubble diameter and ultrasonic parameters on in vitro sonothrombolysis efficacy

Michael J Borrelli1, William D O'Brien, Eric Hamilton

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street Slot #556, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA. mjborrelli@uams.edu

Abstract

Insights

Microbubble size and ultrasound parameters significantly impact sonothrombolysis efficacy. Optimal results depend on matching microbubble size to ultrasound frequency for effective clot lysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Acoustic Medicine
  • Thrombosis Research

Background:

  • Sonothrombolysis utilizes ultrasound to enhance clot dissolution.
  • Microbubbles (MBs) are crucial agents in ultrasound-mediated thrombolysis.
  • Optimizing MB properties and ultrasound parameters is key for therapeutic efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the effects of microbubble size, elasticity, and pulsed ultrasonic parameters on in vitro sonothrombolysis efficacy.
  • To determine the relationship between microbubble characteristics and ultrasound settings for optimal clot lysis.
  • To investigate potential safety implications of varying parameters for in vivo applications.

Main Methods:

  • Monodisperse microbubbles (1 μm and 3 μm) were used to lyse rabbit blood clots.
  • Pulsed ultrasound at 1 MHz and 3 MHz was applied.
  • Sonothrombolysis efficacy was measured based on clot mass loss, varying microbubble size, concentration, ultrasound frequency, intensity, pulse duration, pulse repeat frequency, and duty cycle.

Main Results:

  • Sonothrombolysis was more effective with 3-μm MBs at 1 MHz and 1-μm MBs at 3 MHz.
  • Maximal efficacy was achieved when microbubbles largely remained intact, particularly 3-μm MBs at 1 MHz.
  • Significant microbubble destruction was observed with 1-μm MBs at 3 MHz, suggesting a role for microbubble collapse in lysis.

Conclusions:

  • Microbubble size and elasticity can be tailored to optimize ultrasound parameters for sonothrombolysis.
  • Comparable maximal sonothrombolysis was achieved with significantly lower ultrasound intensity using 3-μm MBs compared to 1-μm MBs.
  • Ultrasound parameters maximizing microbubble survival generally yielded maximal sonothrombolysis, with exceptions noted for 1-μm MBs at 3 MHz.