Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
Published on: May 6, 2021
A Comparison of Testing Parameters and the Implementation of a Group Sequential Design for Equivalence Studies Using
1Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Prevention and Research Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract:
We address the problem of establishing two-sided equivalence using paired-sample analysis of two treatments or two laboratory tests with a binary endpoint. Through real data examples and monte carlo simulations, we compare three commonly used testing parameters, namely, the difference of response probabilities, the ratio of response probabilities, and the ratio of discordant probabilities based on score test statistics for constructing equivalence hypothesis tests of paired binary data. We provide suggestions on the choice of these three testing parameters and proper equivalence margins in hypothesis formulation of equivalence testing. In addition, we describe the implementation of a group sequential design in the context of equivalence testing with early stopping to reject, as well as to declare equivalence.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Group Design
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

