Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Natural and Artificial Concepts01:24

Natural and Artificial Concepts

In psychology, concepts can be divided into two categories: natural and artificial. Natural concepts are formed through direct or indirect experiences. For example, consider the concept of snow. If you live in a place with regular snowfall, such as Essex Junction, Vermont, you know snow through direct experiences. You’ve seen it fall, touched it, shoveled it, and played in it. You recognize its texture, appearance, and even its smell. In contrast, if you live on an island like Saint Vincent in...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Storage01:23

Storage

A schema is a mental framework that helps individuals organize and interpret information. Schemata, formed from previous experiences, influence how we process new information: how we encode it, the inferences we make, and how we retrieve it. For instance, a schema for what a typical classroom looks like might include desks, a teacher's desk, a whiteboard, and students in such an environment. This expectation helps us quickly understand and navigate new classrooms without needing to analyze each...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond text: Using network centralities and AI models to detect suicide risk on Reddit.

International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP·2026
Same author

Machine learning using PROFUND components for 30-day readmission prediction in multimorbid patients: a prospective multicentre study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Joint probability framework for the development and validation of a prognostic model for the conditional outcome of quality of life: a retrospective study in historical European cohorts of survivors of head and neck cancer.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same author

Development and Validation of the Resilience in Eating Disorders Scale (RED-5).

Actas espanolas de psiquiatria·2026
Same author

AI and Wearables for Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Systematic Review.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Scalable Big Data Platform With End-to-End Traceability for Health Data Monitoring in Older Adults: Development and Performance Evaluation.

JMIR medical informatics·2025
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

A distributed reasoning engine ecosystem for semantic context-management in smart environments.

Aitor Almeida1, Diego López-de-Ipiña

  • 1Deusto Institute of Technology (DeustoTech), University of Deusto, Bilbao 48007, Spain. aitor.almeida@deusto.es

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 1, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Smart environments need context awareness. This study introduces a distributed agent architecture to efficiently process large amounts of context data, reducing inference time for better adaptation.

Keywords:
context-aware systemsdistributed reasoningintelligent environmentsmulti-agent systemssemantic inference

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Ubiquitous Computing

Background:

  • Smart environments require context awareness for adequate reaction and adaptation.
  • Context modeling using ontologies and semantic inference is crucial for understanding and adapting to environmental changes.
  • Centralized semantic inference faces scalability challenges in data-intensive smart environments with numerous sensors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the computational burden of centralized context reasoning in large-scale smart environments.
  • To propose and evaluate a distributed approach for context reasoning to improve efficiency and reduce inference time.
  • To analyze the suitability of distributed versus centralized reasoning for different smart environment scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a distributed peer-to-peer agent architecture comprising context consumers and providers.
  • Implementation of an inference sharing mechanism that partitions context information based on agent interests, location, and certainty factors.
  • Analysis of the system architecture, including the agent negotiation process, and comparison with centralized reasoning approaches.

Main Results:

  • The proposed distributed architecture effectively partitions context reasoning tasks.
  • Inference sharing mechanism allows for efficient processing of context data distributed among agents.
  • Comparison highlights scenarios where distributed reasoning outperforms centralized methods in terms of reduced inference time.

Conclusions:

  • Distributed context reasoning offers a scalable solution for modern smart environments with extensive sensor networks.
  • The peer-to-peer agent architecture and inference sharing mechanism effectively manage and process complex context information.
  • This approach provides a more efficient alternative to centralized reasoning, particularly in data-rich and dynamic smart environments.