Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Central auditory conduction time in the rat.

N A Shaw1

  • 1Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Experimental Brain Research
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anoxygenic phototroph of the Chloroflexota uses a type I reaction centre.

Nature·2024
Same author

Prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfadiazine during chemotherapy in dogs with lymphoma and osteosarcoma: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2007
Same author

The effects of electroconvulsive shock on retinal activity.

Physiology & behavior·1999
Same author

The effects of electroconvulsive shock on the primary cortical auditory potential.

Biological psychiatry·1998
Same author

The effects of electroconvulsive shock on the short-latency somatosensory evoked potential in the rat.

Brain research bulletin·1998
Same author

The relationship between the putative optic pathway potential and the electroretinogram.

Physiology & behavior·1998
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

This study measured central auditory conduction time (CACT) in rats for the first time, finding it to be 6.6 ms. This auditory processing time is twice as long as somatosensory conduction time in rats.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Animal Models

Background:

  • Central conduction time (CCT) quantifies neural signal transit through central sensory pathways.
  • Establishing CCT in animal models is crucial for understanding auditory processing and neurological disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To formally measure central auditory conduction time (CACT) in the rat.
  • To establish a baseline for auditory pathway processing speed in a mammalian model.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneous recording of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) and primary auditory cortex response (P1) in rats.
  • Calculation of CACT by subtracting the latency of BAEP wave II (cochlear nucleus origin) from the P1 latency.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A mean central auditory conduction time (CACT) of 6.6 ms was determined in rats.
  • The measured CACT in rats was found to be approximately twice the estimated central somatosensory conduction time.

Conclusions:

  • This study provides the first formal measurement of CACT in an animal model.
  • The findings support theoretical estimates and highlight significant differences between auditory and somatosensory central conduction times in rats.