Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Determining Glucose Metabolism Kinetics Using 18F-FDG Micro-PET/CT
Published on: May 2, 2017
Modeling 18F-FDG kinetics during acute lung injury: experimental data and estimation errors.
A Susanne Dittrich1, Tilo Winkler, Tyler Wellman
1Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Increased lung fluid in acute lung injury (ALI) causes errors in 2-deoxy-2-[18F]flouro-D-glucose (FDG) PET kinetic analysis. A four-compartment model offers more accurate FDG quantification than traditional methods in ALI.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear medicine
- Pulmonary imaging
- Pharmacokinetics
Background:
- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]flouro-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) is increasingly used to assess pulmonary inflammation in acute lung injury (ALI).
- Estimating (18)F-FDG kinetics is crucial for understanding lung pathophysiology during ALI.
- The accuracy of kinetic parameter estimation can be affected by physiological changes like increased extra-vascular lung water.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of extra-vascular lung water on (18)F-FDG kinetic parameter estimates.
- To compare the accuracy of traditional methods (Patlak and Sokoloff) with a novel four-compartment model in estimating (18)F-FDG kinetics under conditions of lung injury.
Main Methods:
- Experimental study in eleven sheep with induced ALI (lung lavage and mechanical ventilation) and five sheep with endotoxemia.
- Dynamic (18)F-FDG PET scans were performed.
- Simulations of normal and ALI (18)F-FDG kinetics were conducted to assess parameter dependence on transport rates.
- Kinetic parameters (Ki, k(3), F(e)) were estimated using Patlak, Sokoloff, and a four-compartment model.
Main Results:
- The four-compartment model explained 85.7% of the studied (18)F-FDG kinetics better than the Sokoloff model.
- The Sokoloff model showed a significant positive bias in net uptake rate (Ki) and inaccurate estimates of its components (k(3), F(e)) compared to the four-compartment model.
- Simulations revealed that extra-vascular fluid significantly impacted Ki estimates, with larger errors for Patlak and Sokoloff methods in ALI compared to normal lungs.
Conclusions:
- Accumulation of (18)F-FDG in extra-vascular fluid during ALI leads to substantial errors in kinetic parameter estimation using Patlak and Sokoloff methods.
- These errors are influenced by the volume and transport rates of the extra-vascular compartment.
- The four-compartment model provides more accurate quantification of (18)F-FDG kinetics in the presence of increased extra-vascular fluid during lung injury.
More Related Videos
06:53Management of Respiratory Motion Artefacts in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography using an Amplitude-Based Optimal Respiratory Gating Algorithm
Published on: July 23, 2020
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018