Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy of a short multimodal workshop including stress management and communication skills training on objective structured clinical examination performance and exam-related anxiety in French medical students: a randomized controlled study.

Journal of educational evaluation for health professions·2026
Same author

Correlation Between Quantitative Pupillometry and Other Markers for Neuroprognostication of Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Bicentric Study.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same author

Challenges and Opportunities in Postgraduate Digital Health Education.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Assessment of therapeutic management practices in generalized and focal motor status epilepticus: An international survey in French, Belgian, and Swiss intensive care units.

Journal of intensive medicine·2026
Same author

Inflammation and endothelium after cardiac arrest: a complex relationship.

European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care·2026
Same author

Factors associated with student success in objective structured clinical examinations and written exams.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Physicians' attitudes and perceived diagnostic confidence in point-of-care ultrasound in gynecology and obstetrics (GO-POCUS): a prospective single-center implementation study with structured training.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Assessment of 21st century skills among health management students in Türkiye: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Virtual reality-based training improves thoracentesis skills in medical interns: a randomized controlled trial.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

A fellows first night on call: managing the chaos in the storm.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Admission test and academic outcomes in Italian dental education: a retrospective evaluation at the University of Turin.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Qualitative assessment of a virtual cardiovascular medical education program in Haiti: local physicians in-training experiences.

BMC medical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 17, 2026

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

Script concordance tests production optimization using enhanced interactive training: randomized, single-blind,

Antoine Gaillet1, Anne-Ségolène Cottereau2, Alain Cariou3

  • 1Medical Intensive Care Department, Bichat Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75018, Paris, France. antoine.gaillet@aphp.fr.

BMC Medical Education
|May 15, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Training junior faculty on the Script Concordance Test (SCT) significantly improves the quality of assessments. This study demonstrates that even a short training program enhances the production of valid SCTs, benefiting clinical reasoning evaluation.

Keywords:
Script Concordance TestsUndergraduate students

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 17, 2026

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
07:31

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills

Published on: February 13, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Clinical Reasoning Assessment

Background:

  • The Script Concordance Test (SCT) is a valuable tool for assessing clinical reasoning.
  • Faculty awareness and panelist recruitment for SCT development present challenges.
  • This study investigated the impact of training on SCT quality among junior faculty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the benefits of providing training on the quality of Script Concordance Tests (SCTs) developed by junior faculty members.
  • To assess the impact of interactive training on the validity of SCTs.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, single-blind, two-center trial was conducted.
  • The intervention involved a 2-hour interactive training session on SCT writing.
  • The primary outcome measured was the percentage of valid post-intervention SCTs in trained versus control groups.

Main Results:

  • Trained junior faculty produced a significantly higher percentage of valid SCTs (41%) compared to the control group (16%, p < 0.001).
  • A sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings, showing an adjusted odds ratio of 2.53 (p < 0.001) for producing valid SCTs in the trained group.
  • 115 participants across two medical schools generated 460 SCTs, with nine expert panels assembled.

Conclusions:

  • Initial training in SCT writing quality offers significant benefits for inexperienced physicians.
  • Training enhances the production of valid Script Concordance Tests, improving clinical reasoning assessment tools.