Average versus highest intraocular pressure analyses in glaucoma clinical trials
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Laser Capture Microdissection of Highly Pure Trabecular Meshwork from Mouse Eyes for Gene Expression Analysis
Published on: June 3, 2018
D L DeMill1, Barbara M Wirostko, Lindsay A Nelson
1Department of Ophthalmology, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Purpose:
To evaluate methods which account for both eyes as a single, independent variable in glaucoma clinical trials.
Methods:
A review of clinical trial articles published between January 1995 and April 2011 evaluating currently used topical glaucoma medications.
Results:
This analysis included 17 articles with 36 treatment arms of which 14 were prostaglandins, 13 β-blockers, 6 topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and 3 α-agonists. Twenty-four articles used average intraocular pressure (IOP) analysis, 12 used the highest IOP analysis and none utilized the randomized eye method. At untreated baseline, there was a difference in the IOP between average IOP and highest baseline IOP analyses at 8 a.m. (p = 0.001) and for the diurnal curve (p = 0.02) as well as specifically for β-blockers (p = 0.002) at 8 a.m. and β-blockers for the diurnal curve (p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
This study suggests that the highest IOP analysis method generally provides slightly higher IOPs at baseline than the average IOP analysis method.
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment

