Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Supplementing cross-cover communication with the patient acuity rating
Andrew W Phillips1, Trevor C Yuen, Elizabeth Retzer
1Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Background:
Patient hand-offs at physician shift changes have limited ability to convey the primary team's longitudinal insight. The Patient Acuity Rating (PAR) is a previously validated, 7-point scale that quantifies physician judgment of patient stability, where a higher score indicates a greater risk of clinical deterioration. Its impact on cross-covering physician understanding of patients is not known.
Objective:
To determine PAR contribution to sign-outs.
Design:
Cross-sectional survey.
Subjects:
Intern physicians at a university teaching hospital.
Interventions:
Subjects were surveyed using randomly chosen, de-identified patient sign-outs, previously assigned PAR scores by their primary teams. For each sign-out, subjects assigned a PAR score, then responded to hypothetical cross-cover scenarios before and after being informed of the primary team's PAR.
Main Measure:
Changes in intern assessment of the scenario before and after being informed of the primary team's PAR were measured. In addition, responses between novice and experienced interns were compared.
Key Results:
Between May and July 2008, 23 of 39 (59 %) experienced interns and 25 of 42 (60 %) novice interns responded to 480 patient scenarios from ten distinct sign-outs. The mean PAR score assigned by subjects was 4.2 ± 1.6 vs. 3.8 ± 1.8 by the primary teams (p < 0.001). After viewing the primary team's PAR score, interns changed their level of concern in 47.9 % of cases, their assessment of the importance of immediate bedside evaluation in 48.7 % of cases, and confidence in their assessment in 43.2 % of cases. For all three assessments, novice interns changed their responses more frequently than experienced interns (p = 0.03, 0.009, and <0.001, respectively). Overall interns reported the PAR score to be theoretically helpful in 70.8 % of the cases, but this was more pronounced in novice interns (81.2 % vs 59.6 %, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
The PAR adds valuable information to sign-outs that could impact cross-cover decision-making and potentially benefit patients. However, correct training in its use may be required to avoid unintended consequences.
Related Concept Videos
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Planning Nursing Care I

