Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Measurements of Long-range Electronic Correlations During Femtosecond Diffraction Experiments Performed on Nanocrystals of Buckminsterfullerene
Published on: August 22, 2017
On the discrepancy between theory and experiment for the F-F spin-spin coupling constant of difluoroethyne
Rasmus Faber1, Stephan P A Sauer
1University of Copenhagen, Department of Chemistry, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Abstract:
The vicinal indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constant (SSCC) between the two fluorine atoms in difluoroethyne has been reinvestigated. This coupling has previously proved to be difficult to calculate accurately. In this study we have therefore systematically investigated the dependence of this coupling on the choice of one-electron basis set, the choice of correlated wave function method and the inclusion of zero-point vibrational and temperature corrections. All terms of the SSCC have been evaluated at the second-order polarization propagator, SOPPA and SOPPA(CCSD), and coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) levels of theory and for the most correlation dependent term, the paramagnetic spin-orbit contribution (PSO), also at the very accurate CC3 level. We find that in order to get results that are well converged with respect to the basis set, one needs to use special SSCC optimized basis sets of at least quadruple zeta quality and with added diffuse functions. Furthermore, the PSO term is not yet converged at the CCSD level as shown by the CC3 calculations. Finally, it is shown that vibrational effects are very important, as they are in this case of the same order of magnitude as the equilibrium geometry value of the coupling constant. Only by using a converged basis set and including both vibrational and higher order correlation effects can we obtain agreement with the experimental value for this coupling.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
Valence Bond Theory

