Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
Motor Units01:13

Motor Units

The motor unit is a fundamental component of the neuromuscular system and plays a crucial role in coordinating muscle contractions. It consists of a somatic motor neuron, which connects and controls multiple skeletal muscle fibers, forming a single functional segment. The axon of the motor neuron branches out and establishes synaptic connections known as neuromuscular junctions with individual muscle fibers within the motor unit.
Motor units come in different sizes, with smaller units...
Motor Units00:46

Motor Units

A motor unit consists of two main components: a single efferent motor neuron (i.e., a neuron that carries impulses away from the central nervous system) and all of the muscle fibers it innervates. The motor neuron may innervate multiple muscle fibers, which are single cells, but only one motor neuron innervates a single muscle fiber.
Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control01:07

Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control

Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Root-Locus Method01:19

Root-Locus Method

A cruise control system in a car is designed to maintain a specified speed automatically by adjusting the gas pedal. The system continuously measures the vehicle's speed and makes fine adjustments to the pedal to achieve this goal. The root locus method is particularly useful for understanding how the cruise control system's behavior changes under varying conditions, such as when the car goes uphill, downhill, or faces strong wind resistance.
This system can be represented by a block diagram,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does stimulus order affect central tendency and serial dependence in vestibular path integration?

iScience·2026
Same author

How prior motor states can shape perceptual decision bias: Insights from sensorimotor beta oscillations.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Internal models in active self-motion estimation: role of inertial sensory cues.

Journal of neurophysiology·2025
Same author

Reaching Distance Influences Perceptual Decisions.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

Central tendency and serial dependence in vestibular path integration.

Journal of neurophysiology·2024
Same author

Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease Affects Fast But Not Slow Adaptive Processes in Motor Learning.

eNeuro·2024
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

How does our motor system determine its learning rate?

Robert J van Beers1

  • 1MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.j.van.beers@vu.nl

Plos One
|November 16, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The brain does not optimize motor learning for each movement individually. Instead, it uses a simpler strategy with a fixed learning rate based on error-signal reliability.

More Related Videos

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Monitoring Fine and Associative Motor Learning in Mice Using the Erasmus Ladder
08:51

Monitoring Fine and Associative Motor Learning in Mice Using the Erasmus Ladder

Published on: December 15, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice
06:04

Study Motor Skill Learning by Single-pellet Reaching Tasks in Mice

Published on: March 4, 2014

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Monitoring Fine and Associative Motor Learning in Mice Using the Erasmus Ladder
08:51

Monitoring Fine and Associative Motor Learning in Mice Using the Erasmus Ladder

Published on: December 15, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Motor learning is fundamentally driven by movement errors, with the learning rate quantifying error correction in subsequent movements.
  • Previous research indicated learning rates depend on error signal reliability and motor system state uncertainty, aligning with Kalman filter predictions for optimal error minimization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the learning rate is optimized for every individual movement, not just on average.
  • To test the applicability of the Kalman filter model in predicting motor learning behavior at the individual movement level.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed repeated movements to visual targets with their non-dominant hand.
  • Endpoint errors were provided as immediate visual feedback after each movement.
  • The reliability of error signals was manipulated across three experimental conditions.

Main Results:

  • Observed learning rates were inconsistent with Kalman filter predictions, showing slower-than-predicted correction for initial large errors.
  • The learning rates for movement extent and direction did not vary as predicted by the Kalman filter.
  • A simpler model, employing a fixed learning rate for movements with consistent error-signal reliability, adequately explained the experimental data.

Conclusions:

  • The brain does not employ complex state estimation for optimizing motor planning corrections on a per-movement basis.
  • A more straightforward strategy is utilized, involving a fixed learning rate determined by the reliability of the error signal.