Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Y Chromosome Determines Maleness02:19

The Y Chromosome Determines Maleness

The Y chromosome is a sex chromosome found in several vertebrates and mammals, including humans. In addition to 22 pairs of autosomes, the human males have one X chromosome and one Y chromosome. In these organisms, the presence or absence of the Y chromosome determines the development of male traits.
Evolution
Around 300 million years ago, the two sex chromosomes diverged from two identical autosomal chromosomes. Over time, the Y chromosome has lost most of its genes, shrinking in size. Today,...
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes02:45

The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes

In most organisms, sex is determined by the ratio of X and Y chromosomes. However, in some organisms, such as Drosophila and C.elegans, sex is determined by the ratio of the number of X chromosomes to the number of sets of autosomes. The Y chromosome in Drosophila is active but does not determine sex. It contains genes responsible for the production of sperms in adult flies.  
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female Drosophila...
Biological Influences on Intelligence01:30

Biological Influences on Intelligence

Intelligence is often thought to be linked to brain size, but the relationship is more complex than that. While brain size does correlate modestly with some abilities, like verbal skills, the connection is weaker for others, such as spatial reasoning. Other factors, like brain structure, also play crucial roles. For instance, despite Einstein's smaller-than-average brain, his parietal cortex, which is involved in spatial reasoning, was 15% wider, suggesting that neural density might matter more...
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Sex-linked Disorders01:43

Sex-linked Disorders

Like autosomes, sex chromosomes contain a variety of genes necessary for normal body function. When a mutation in one of these genes results in biological deficits, the disorder is considered sex-linked.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Data from the Researcher Mental Health Observatory STAIRCASE Survey.

Journal of open psychology data·2026
Same author

The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Evidence and consequences of academic drift in the field of dental research: A bibliometric analysis 2000-2015.

BDJ open·2022
Same author

Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator.

PloS one·2019
Same author

Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports.

Scientometrics·2018
Same author

Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact.

PloS one·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Protocol for Studying Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Naturally Cycling Female Rats
09:07

Protocol for Studying Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Naturally Cycling Female Rats

Published on: February 23, 2015

Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon?

Pleun van Arensbergen1, Inge van der Weijden, Peter van den Besselaar

  • 1Science System Assessment, Rathenau Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Scientometrics
|November 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Research performance differences between male and female scientists are diminishing. In younger generations, female researchers now show higher performance, reflecting broader educational trends.

More Related Videos

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Protocol for Studying Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Naturally Cycling Female Rats
09:07

Protocol for Studying Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Naturally Cycling Female Rats

Published on: February 23, 2015

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Bibliometrics
  • Gender Studies in Science

Background:

  • Existing literature extensively documents research performance disparities between male and female scientists.
  • Explanations for these observed differences have been a long-standing topic of academic inquiry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate contemporary research performance differences between male and female social scientists.
  • To determine if historical performance gaps persist in younger cohorts of researchers.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of publication records from a cohort of 852 social scientists.
  • Comparative performance assessment focusing on gender and career stage.

Main Results:

  • Confirmation of existing research performance differences between male and female scientists.
  • Evidence suggesting a disappearance of these differences in the younger generation of researchers.
  • Observation that, where differences persist, young female researchers outperform their male counterparts.

Conclusions:

  • The trend of women outperforming men in education is extending into the scientific system.
  • Gender-based performance disparities in science may be evolving, particularly among early-career researchers.