Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: systematic review of the methods

Mohamad Alshurafa1, Matthias Briel, Elie A Akl

  • 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Plos One
|November 21, 2012
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

There is no agreement on how to define intention to treat (ITT) when there is missing outcome data (MOD). Researchers suggest clearly reporting how complete and missing data are handled in trials.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Authors of randomized trial reports have varied views on the relationship between missing outcome data (MOD) and intention to treat (ITT).
  • Lack of consensus complicates the consistent application and interpretation of ITT principles in research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically investigate how methodology articles define ITT in the presence of MOD.
  • To examine recommended strategies for handling MOD within an ITT framework.
  • To propose improvements for defining and using ITT concerning MOD.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic search of MEDLINE for methodological articles discussing ITT and MOD.
  • Inclusion criteria focused on articles dedicating substantial text to ITT and MOD.
  • Independent data extraction by two reviewers from eligible articles.

Main Results:

  • Of 66 eligible articles, 55% discussed the relationship between ITT and MOD.
  • Commonly held views included: complete follow-up is required for ITT (58%), ITT and MOD are separate (17%), and ITT requires specific MOD handling strategies (78%).
  • Frequently recommended MOD handling strategies included last outcome carried forward (50%), sensitivity analysis (50%), and imputation (46%).

Conclusions:

  • No consensus exists on the definition of ITT in relation to MOD.
  • Proposes separate reporting of how participants with complete data and those with MOD are handled in randomized trials and systematic reviews for conceptual clarity.

Related Concept Videos

Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...