Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: systematic review of the methods
Mohamad Alshurafa1, Matthias Briel, Elie A Akl
1Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Background:
Authors of randomized trial reports seem to hold a variety of views regarding the relationship between missing outcome data (MOD) and intention to treat (ITT). The objectives of this study were to systematically investigate how authors of methodology articles define ITT in the presence of MOD, how they recommend handling MOD under ITT, and to make a proposal for potential improvement in the definition and use of ITT in relation to MOD.
Methods And Findings:
We systematically searched MEDLINE in February 2009 for methodological articles written in English that devoted at least one paragraph to ITT and two other paragraphs to either ITT or MOD. We excluded original trial reports, observational studies, and clinical systematic reviews. Working in teams of two, we independently extracted relevant information from each eligible article. Of 1007 titles and abstracts reviewed, 66 articles met eligibility criteria. Five (8%) did not provide a definition of ITT; 25 (38%) mentioned MOD but did not discuss its relationship to ITT; and 36 (55%) discussed the relationship of MOD with ITT. These 36 articles described one or more of three statements: complete follow-up is required for ITT (58%); ITT and MOD are separate issues (17%); and ITT requires a specific strategy for handling MOD (78%); 17 (47%) endorsed more than one relationship. The most frequently mentioned strategies for handling MOD within ITT were: using the last outcome carried forward (50%); sensitivity analysis (50%); and use of available data to impute missing data (46%).
Conclusion:
We found that there is no consensus on the definition of ITT in relation to MOD. For conceptual clarity, we suggest that both reports of randomized trials and systematic reviews separately consider and describe how they deal with participants with complete data and those with MOD.
Insights
There is no agreement on how to define intention to treat (ITT) when there is missing outcome data (MOD). Researchers suggest clearly reporting how complete and missing data are handled in trials.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biostatistics
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Authors of randomized trial reports have varied views on the relationship between missing outcome data (MOD) and intention to treat (ITT).
- Lack of consensus complicates the consistent application and interpretation of ITT principles in research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically investigate how methodology articles define ITT in the presence of MOD.
- To examine recommended strategies for handling MOD within an ITT framework.
- To propose improvements for defining and using ITT concerning MOD.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of MEDLINE for methodological articles discussing ITT and MOD.
- Inclusion criteria focused on articles dedicating substantial text to ITT and MOD.
- Independent data extraction by two reviewers from eligible articles.
Main Results:
- Of 66 eligible articles, 55% discussed the relationship between ITT and MOD.
- Commonly held views included: complete follow-up is required for ITT (58%), ITT and MOD are separate (17%), and ITT requires specific MOD handling strategies (78%).
- Frequently recommended MOD handling strategies included last outcome carried forward (50%), sensitivity analysis (50%), and imputation (46%).
Conclusions:
- No consensus exists on the definition of ITT in relation to MOD.
- Proposes separate reporting of how participants with complete data and those with MOD are handled in randomized trials and systematic reviews for conceptual clarity.
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Regression Toward the Mean