Femoral venous oxygen saturation is no surrogate for central venous oxygen saturation
Paul A van Beest1, Alice van der Schors, Henriëtte Liefers
1Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.van. beest@umcg.nl
Objective:
The purpose of our study was to determine if central venous oxygen saturation and femoral venous oxygen saturation can be used interchangeably during surgery and in critically ill patients.
Design:
Prospective observational controlled study.
Setting:
Nonacademic university-affiliated teaching hospital in The Netherlands.
Patients:
One hundred cardiac outpatients, 30 high-risk surgical patients, and 30 critically ill patients.
Interventions:
None.
Methods And Main Results:
We concurrently determined femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in a group of 100 stable cardiac patients, which served as control group. Furthermore, we determined simultaneously femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in 30 surgical patients and in 30 critically ill patients and evaluated changes over time. Correlation and agreement of femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation were assessed, including the difference between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation.Despite significant correlation between obtained values of femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation (rs = 0.55; p < .001), the limits of agreement were wide in the control group (mean bias 2.7% ± 7.9%; 95% limits of agreement -12.9% to 18.2%). In both the surgical and critically ill patients, limits of agreement (mean bias of -1.9% ± 9.3%; 95% limits of agreement -20.0% to 16.3%, and mean bias of 4.6% ± 14.3%; 95% limits of agreement -23.5% to 32.6%, respectively) were wide. Results for changes of femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation were similar. During initial treatment of critically ill patients, the difference between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation including its range of variation diminished.
Conclusion:
There is lack of agreement between femoral venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation in both stable and unstable medical conditions. Thus, femoral venous oxygen saturation should not be used as surrogate for central venous oxygen saturation.
More Related Videos
09:04Skeletal Muscle Neurovascular Coupling, Oxidative Capacity, and Microvascular Function with 'One Stop Shop' Near-infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: February 20, 2018
04:20Integration of Brain Tissue Saturation Monitoring in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Heart Failure
Published on: October 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
01:19Special considerations while measuring oxygen saturation
Ensuring accuracy in vital sign recordings while prioritizing patient comfort and minimizing anxiety is important.
01:19Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
01:17Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this principle...
01:04Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system as it...
01:24Pulse Oximetry
Purpose
Average SpO2 values are greater than 95%. If the readings fall below 90%, it indicates that...
01:27Oxygen Transport in the Blood