Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Murine Kidney Transplant Technique
Published on: October 20, 2015
Development of a program for kidney transplants using organs donated from donors awaiting cardiac arrest (type III
José Portolés-Pérez1, Juan J Rubio-Muñoz, Omar Lafuente-Covarrubias
1Servicio de Nefrología. Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro. Madrid, Spain.
Insights
Kidney transplants from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) show promising short-term results. Expanding NHBD utilization can decrease kidney transplant waiting times.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplantation Surgery
- Organ Donation
Background:
- Organ donor availability is a critical barrier to kidney transplantation.
- Non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) can supply up to one-third of all organs for transplantation.
- Type III Maastricht donors (controlled donors after circulatory arrest) represent an underutilized source for organ procurement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility and short-term outcomes of kidney transplantation using organs from controlled non-heart-beating donors (Maastricht type III).
- To establish a protocol for organ procurement and management from NHBDs.
- To assess the impact of NHBD kidney transplants on reducing waiting list times.
Main Methods:
- A descriptive series of 10 kidney transplant cases from NHBDs (Maastricht type III) was conducted.
- A protocol was developed for organ extraction, management, and immunosuppression (thymoglobulin, steroids, mycophenolate, tacrolimus).
- Graft perfusion techniques included in situ perfusion and antegrade perfusion via ante-mortem cannulation, with a maximum warm ischemia time of 60 minutes.
Main Results:
- Ten kidney transplants were performed using organs from 5 NHBDs (mean donor age 57 years).
- Mean warm ischemia time was 20 minutes, and mean cold ischemia time was 7.5 hours.
- Recipient outcomes included a mean serum creatinine of 2.1 mg/dL at one month post-transplant, with four cases of prolonged acute tubular necrosis and a mean hospital stay of 24.5 days.
Conclusions:
- Kidney transplantation from Maastricht type III non-heart-beating donors demonstrates favorable short-term outcomes.
- This approach has the potential to significantly reduce waiting list times for kidney transplant candidates.
- Further systematic development and expanded use of NHBDs are recommended to address organ scarcity.
Introduction:
The availability of organ donors is a limiting factor for kidney transplants. Donations from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) can provide as many as one-third of all organs. Controlled patients awaiting cardiac arrest following limitation of life support techniques, or type III Maastricht donors, constitute an alternative that still has yet to be systematically developed.
Study Type:
Descriptive series of 10 cases occurring between January and April 2012.
Method:
Over a period of 6 months, we designed a protocol for extracting and managing kidney transplants and providing immunosuppression therapy. Patients are evaluated in accordance with the criteria agreed by a different team responsible for transplant coordination. We established a maximum duration of time between limitation of life-sustaining therapy and death of 120 minutes and 60 minutes warm ischaemia. Two types of graft perfusion were used, one in situ through direct application to the surgical area, and another using ante mortem vascular canalisation. Immunosuppression therapy included induction with thymoglobulin, steroids, and mycophenolate, with introduction of tacrolimus on the seventh day. Data are expressed as median and (range).
Results:
We included the first 10 cases of kidney transplants with organs from 5 NHBD (type III Maastricht): 4 males, mean age of 57 years (45-66 years), with limitation of life-sustaining therapy due to anoxic encephalopathy (2), intoxication (1), acute stroke (2) and terminal respiratory failure (1). The following mean time intervals were recorded: effective warm ischaemia: 20 minutes (8-23 minutes) and cold ischaemia: 7.5 hours (4-14.1 hours). Recipients had a mean age of 58 years (32-71 years), with various aetiologies (2 cases of glomerulonephritis, 1 polycystic kidney disease, 2 tubulo-interstitial nephropathy, 4 vascular, and 1 unknown), with a mean 31.7 months on haemodialysis (11-84 months); the kidney was a second transplant in two cases. No patients were hyper-immunised. Six patients required a dialysis session at some point, and four had prolonged acute tubular necrosis, over a mean hospitalisation period of 24.5 days (8-44 days). Mean creatinine (Cr) one month after transplantation was 2.1mg/dl (0.7-3.2mg/dl), and mean nadir creatinine was 1.2mg/dl (0.7-3.2mg/dl). One patient did not improve upon Cr values <3.2mg/dl, despite the absence of evidence of toxicity or rejection in a renal biopsy, and the transplant pair reached a Cr of 1.4mg/dl. Throughout the series, similar surgical complications were recorded to those observed in conventional donor situations.
Conclusions:
Despite the limitations of this preliminary study, the use of this type of transplant produces favourable short-term evolution. Expanded use of this type of donor could reduce the waiting-list time for a kidney transplant.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

