Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Karyotyping

Karyotyping

Karyotyping

Karyotyping

Genetic Screens

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...

Genomics

Genomics

Genomics is the science of genomes: it is the study of all the genetic material of an organism. In humans, the genome consists of information carried in 23 pairs of chromosomes in the nucleus, as well as mitochondrial DNA. In genomics, both coding and non-coding DNA is sequenced and analyzed. Genomics allows a better understanding of all living things, their evolution, and their diversity. It has a myriad of uses: for example, to build phylogenetic trees, to improve productivity and...

Polytene Chromosomes

Polytene Chromosomes

Polytene chromosomes are giant interphase chromosomes with several DNA strands placed side by side. They were discovered in the year 1881 by Balbiani in salivary glands, intestine, muscles, malpighian tubules, and hypoderm of larvae Chironomus plumosus. Hence, these are also called "Salivary gland chromosomes." These are found in insects of the order Diptera and Collembola; in certain organs of mammals; and synergids, antipodes of flowering plants. Polytene chromosomes are also regularly...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Vertical inheritance and unique differential phenotypes of reciprocal recombinant chromosome 18 within a multi-generation family.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2025

Same author

Guidelines for the testing and reporting of cytogenetic results for risk stratification of multiple myeloma: a report of the Cancer Genomics Consortium Plasma Cell Neoplasm Working Group.

Blood cancer journal·2025

Same author

A multicenter analysis of individuals with a 47,XXY/46,XX karyotype.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2024

Same author

Section E6.7-6.12 of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Technical Laboratory Standards: Cytogenomic studies of acquired chromosomal abnormalities in solid tumors.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2024

Same author

ROS1 Alterations as a Potential Driver of Gliomas in Infant, Pediatric, and Adult Patients.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc·2023

Same author

Novel high-risk acute myeloid leukemia subgroup with ERG amplification and Biallelic loss of TP53.

Cancer genetics·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Chromosome Preparation From Cultured Cells

Chromosome Preparation From Cultured Cells

Published on: January 28, 2014

Cytogenetics caseload survey summary 2012.

Denise I Quigley¹, Joyce A Foster, Stephanie N Carter

¹Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR.

Journal of the Association of Genetic Technologists

|November 28, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A 2004 and recent survey show increased complexity and efficiency in cytogenetics laboratories. Current data indicate higher productivity in cytogenetic testing services compared to previous years.

More Related Videos

An Automated Method to Perform The In Vitro Micronucleus Assay using Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

An Automated Method to Perform The In Vitro Micronucleus Assay using Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

Published on: May 13, 2019

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Chromosome Preparation From Cultured Cells

Chromosome Preparation From Cultured Cells

Published on: January 28, 2014

An Automated Method to Perform The In Vitro Micronucleus Assay using Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

An Automated Method to Perform The In Vitro Micronucleus Assay using Multispectral Imaging Flow Cytometry

Published on: May 13, 2019

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

Area of Science:

Medical laboratory science
Genetics and genomics
Clinical diagnostics

Background:

Cytogenetic laboratories perform complex genetic analyses.
Previous surveys established baseline data for laboratory operations.
Tracking changes in laboratory metrics is crucial for resource allocation and quality improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

To re-evaluate cytogenetic laboratory caseload and full-time employee equivalent (FTE) statistics.
To compare current data with a 2004 survey to identify trends.
To assess changes in laboratory complexity, efficiency, and productivity.

Main Methods:

Conducted a survey of cytogenetic laboratories.
Collected data on laboratory type, employee titles, and annual caseload volumes.
Assigned weighted values to test types based on complexity to evaluate workload.

Main Results:

Current data indicate a significant increase in the complexity of cytogenetics lab testing.
Laboratory efficiency and productivity have demonstrably improved since 2004.
Analysis revealed shifts in testing volumes and types, reflecting advancements in the field.

Conclusions:

Cytogenetic laboratories are handling more complex testing than in 2004.
Increased efficiency and productivity suggest successful adaptation to evolving diagnostic demands.
The findings highlight the dynamic nature of cytogenetics and the need for ongoing monitoring of laboratory performance.