Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

07:41
Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems
Published on: July 30, 2019
The effect of size on paired 'C/D' estimations
Summary
Clinical experience did not significantly impact the accuracy of cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio estimations. Accuracy was low overall, especially for larger optic nerve head targets, with implications for glaucoma diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Optometry
- Medical Imaging Analysis
Background:
- Accurate estimation of optic nerve head cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios is crucial for glaucoma diagnosis and management.
- Clinical experience may influence the precision of these estimations, but this has not been definitively established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio estimations among experienced optometrists, student clinicians, and beginning optometry students.
- To evaluate the impact of clinical experience on the accuracy of C/D ratio estimations using stylized targets.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving experienced optometrists, student clinicians, and beginning optometry students.
- Participants estimated C/D ratios on 16 stylized optic nerve head targets.
- Statistical analysis was performed to compare accuracy across different experience levels and target sizes.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in estimation accuracy was found based on clinical experience (alpha = 0.05).
- Overall, only 18.6% of paired estimations (horizontal and vertical) were exactly correct.
- Less than half (45.4%) of estimations were within +/- 0.05 of the true C/D ratios.
- Accuracy was higher for smaller targets and decreased for medium and larger targets.
Conclusions:
- Clinical experience does not significantly affect the accuracy of cup-to-disc ratio estimations.
- The accuracy of C/D ratio estimation is generally low, particularly for larger targets, posing potential challenges in glaucoma diagnosis and management.
- Standardized training and improved documentation methods may be necessary to enhance C/D ratio accuracy in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...

