The probable and the possible at 12 months: intuitive reasoning about the uncertain future

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

Nicolò Cesana-Arlotti1, Erno Téglás, Luca L Bonatti

  • 1ICREA, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España ICREA, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, C. Roc Boronat, 138, Edifici Tanger, 55.110, 08018 Barcelona, España.

Advances in Child Development and Behavior
|December 5, 2012
PubMed

Insights

Infants as young as 12 months may possess an intuitive grasp of probability, enabling them to predict future events. This suggests sophisticated infant reasoning abilities, challenging current adult probabilistic reasoning theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Probabilistic Reasoning

Background:

  • Adults often struggle with probability estimation due to heuristics and biases.
  • Existing theories suggest adults reason about event frequencies, not single event probabilities.
  • Infants may possess an intuitive understanding of probability for novel events.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how infants predict future events by estimating probability.
  • To present a novel theory on infants' intuitive probability estimation.
  • To compare this theory with existing models using current data.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical modeling of infants' intuitive probability estimation.
  • Comparison of the proposed theory with existing literature and data.
  • Analysis of current evidence on infant probabilistic reasoning.

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests 12-month-old infants can estimate probabilities for single, novel events.
  • The proposed theory posits that infants' probability grasp stems from representing logically consistent future possibilities.
  • Current data does not uniquely support one theory but indicates sophisticated infant reasoning.

Conclusions:

  • Infants demonstrate surprisingly advanced reasoning abilities in probabilistic prediction.
  • Infant probabilistic reasoning may be more sophisticated than previously understood.
  • Findings challenge established theories of adult logical and probabilistic reasoning.

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Magical Thinking01:29

Magical Thinking

Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...