Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

06:08
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
Unifying pedagogical reasoning and epistemic trust
Baxter S Eaves1, Patrick Shafto
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 317 Life Sciences Building, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. b0eave01@louisville.edu
Advances in Child Development and Behavior
|December 5, 2012
Summary
Children learn best from knowledgeable and helpful informants. This unified approach to learning from testimony explains children's behavior in trust tasks better than previous models.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Development
- Social Learning Theory
- Epistemology
Background:
- Children learn from others, but face risks from unreliable informants.
- Pedagogical reasoning helps children identify helpful teachers.
- Epistemic trust research focuses on discerning trustworthy information sources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To unify pedagogical reasoning and epistemic trust research.
- To present a formal analysis of learning from informants.
- To explain robust inferences from knowledgeable and helpful informants.
Main Methods:
- Formal analysis of learning from informants.
- Comparison of a new model with standard accounts of learning from teaching.
- Evaluation of the model's prediction of children's behavior in epistemic trust tasks.
Main Results:
- Teaching from knowledgeable, helpful informants supports robust inferences.
- The proposed model better predicts inferences in pedagogical situations.
- The model explains children's epistemic trust behavior using knowledge and helpfulness.
Conclusions:
- Learning from testimony is a joint inference over informant's knowledge and helpfulness.
- Epistemic trust depends on assessing informant's knowledge and helpfulness.
- This unified framework has implications for understanding child development and learning.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Reasoning
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking involves reflective and productive thinking and the evaluation of evidence. Critical thinkers seek to understand the deeper meaning of ideas, question assumptions, and make independent decisions about what to believe or do. Scientists, for instance, are often critical thinkers. Critical thinking also requires humility about what we know and don't know and the motivation to look beyond the obvious. It is essential for effective problem-solving.
Colleges and universities are...
Colleges and universities are...
Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
Cognitivism
Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are themselves.