Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.0K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.0K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

118
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
118
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.8K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

163
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
163

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prosodic Cues Support Inferences About the Question's Pedagogical Intent.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2025
Same author

Young Children's Directed Question Asking in Preschool Classrooms.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

When Children's Production Deviates From Observed Input: Modeling the Variable Production of the English Past Tense.

Cognitive science·2023
Same author

Efficient Discretization of Optimal Transport.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

The Inner Loop of Collective Human-Machine Intelligence.

Topics in cognitive science·2023
Same author

Talk of the Town mobile app platform: New method for engaging family in STEM learning and research in homes and communities.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 2, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

779

Human Variability and the Explore-Exploit Trade-Off in Recommendation.

Scott Cheng-Hsin Yang1, Chirag Rank1, Jake A Whritner2

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Rutgers University.

Cognitive Science
|April 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Recommender systems face a trade-off between exploring new options and exploiting known ones. Increased human variability worsens this exploration-exploitation dilemma, but low variability allows balanced algorithms to mitigate it.

Keywords:
Active learningExploration-exploitation trade-offHuman variabilityRecommender system

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

382
Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 2, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

779
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

382
Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Retrieval

Background:

  • The internet's vastness requires algorithms to help users navigate information and products.
  • Recommender systems face a critical challenge: balancing exploration (discovering new items) and exploitation (recommending known high-rated items).
  • This exploration-exploitation trade-off is influenced by human variability within the user-algorithm interaction loop.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the exploration-exploitation trade-off in recommender systems as a function of human variability.
  • To develop a unifying model bridging active learning and information recommendation.
  • To analyze how human variability impacts the effectiveness of recommender system algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced a unifying model to create a continuum of algorithms along the exploration-exploitation spectrum.
  • Conducted two experiments measuring trade-off behavior across different levels of human variability.
  • Performed a comprehensive simulation study systematically varying human variability.

Main Results:

  • The severity of the exploration-exploitation trade-off increases with greater human variability.
  • A specific regime of low human variability was identified where balanced algorithms can effectively manage the trade-off.
  • The study provides a quantitative understanding of the relationship between human variability and recommender system performance.

Conclusions:

  • Human variability is a key factor determining the challenge of the exploration-exploitation trade-off in recommender systems.
  • Algorithms can overcome this trade-off in low-variability environments by balancing exploration and exploitation.
  • Future research should consider human variability to design more effective and personalized recommender systems.