A differential suction electrode for recording electromyographic activity from the pelvic floor muscles: crosstalk...

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a differential suction electrode (DSE) probe is less prone to recording crosstalk from the hip adductors or external rotators than the Femiscan™ probe when recording electromyography (EMG) data from the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs). Twenty nulliparous, continent women performed hip adduction and hip external rotation contractions at 25%, 50% and 100% of maximal voluntary effort both while keeping their PFMs relaxed and while contracting their PFMs as strongly as possible. All tasks were performed while DSEs were adhered to the vaginal wall at the level of the pubococcygeus group bilaterally, and also with the Femiscan™ probe in situ. The order of the probes was randomized. For each task, the peak smoothed PFM EMG amplitude was compared between hip forces and probes using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the interaction between contraction level and probe (α = 0.05). There was a significant contraction level by probe interaction for each task. In most cases the Femiscan™ probe recorded significantly higher PFM EMG activity during hip adduction and external rotation tasks at 25% and 50% MVC compared to what it recorded when the hip musculature remained relaxed, whereas the DSE probe did not. As such, the DSE probe appears to be less susceptible to crosstalk from the hip adductors and external rotators than the Femiscan™ probe at these hip muscle contraction levels. Both probes recorded significantly higher EMG activity when maximal contractions of the hip adductors and external rotators were performed therefore, no conclusion can be made regarding whether the activity recorded from the PFMs during maximal hip adduction and external rotation is the result of crosstalk or co-activation.