Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

09:02
Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
Published on: January 31, 2025
Predicting cortical bone strength from DXA and dental cone-beam CT
Jui-Ting Hsu1, Ying-Ju Chen, Ming-Tzu Tsai
1School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Plos One
|December 11, 2012
Summary
Dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) shows greater accuracy than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in predicting rat femur and tibia bone strength. The bone strength index (BSI) derived from CBCT measurements demonstrated superior predictive capabilities for fracture load.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Orthopedics
- Radiology
Background:
- Accurate assessment of cortical bone strength is crucial for understanding fracture risk.
- Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a common tool for bone density measurement, but its ability to predict bone strength is limited.
- Dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers higher resolution imaging and can assess volumetric bone mineral density and structural parameters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of DXA and CBCT in predicting the cortical bone strength of rat femurs and tibias.
- To evaluate the correlation between imaging-derived parameters and actual bone fracture load.
Main Methods:
- Rat femurs and tibias (n=14) were scanned using DXA for areal bone mineral density (aBMD).
- The same bones were subsequently scanned using CBCT to measure volumetric cortical bone mineral density (vCtBMD) and cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI).
- A three-point bending test determined the ultimate fracture load, and bivariate linear regression analysis assessed correlations.
Main Results:
- CBCT-derived parameters, including vCtBMD and CSMI, showed stronger correlations with fracture load compared to DXA-derived aBMD.
- The bone strength index (BSI), calculated from CBCT data, exhibited the highest correlation with fracture load for both femur (r=0.822) and tibia (r=0.842).
- All correlations with CBCT-derived parameters and BSI were statistically significant (p<0.05).
Conclusions:
- CBCT is superior to DXA for predicting cortical bone fracture loads in rat long bones.
- The BSI, integrating densitometric and geometric information from CBCT, is a highly effective predictor of bone strength.
- Further clinical validation using human cadaveric specimens is recommended to assess the translational potential of CBCT-derived BSI.

