Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Development of an institutional review board preapproval process for Doctor of Nursing Practice students: process and
Sarah L Szanton1, Holly A Taylor, Mary Terhaar
1Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA. Sszanto1@jhu.edu
Abstract:
As Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs proliferate, effective collaboration with institutional review boards (IRBs) is important to protect human subjects. It is particularly important that faculty and students recognize which DNP students' projects should be considered as "human subjects research" or "quality improvement." The former require IRB review, whereas the latter may be eligible for expedited review or may be considered exempt. We report outcomes following implementation of a combination of didactic training, one-to-one consultation, and a decision support protocol to improve preparation for and collaboration with the IRB at a large university. In the first year of using this protocol, 53% of projects were deemed human subjects research and received IRB review. The other 47% were deemed quality improvement projects and did not require IRB review. We offer our experience as an approach for teaching students how to protect the subjects included in their quality improvement activities.
Related Concept Videos
Preclinical Development: Overview
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Fundamentals of Nursing Process II
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
Fundamentals of Nursing Process I

