Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Comparison of interventional cardiology in two European countries: a nationwide Internet based registry study
T Gudnason1, G S Gudnadottir, B Lagerqvist
1Department of Cardiology, Landspitali University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland; Cardiovascular Research Institute of Landspitali and the University of Iceland, Iceland; University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Insights
Interventional cardiology practices vary globally. This study reveals significant differences in techniques and patient indications between Iceland and Sweden, highlighting the need for comparative registry research.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Interventional cardiology practices exhibit significant international variation.
- This study presents the first nationwide, long-term comparison of interventional cardiology between two countries.
- A common web-based registry facilitated this comparative analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare interventional cardiology practices and outcomes between Iceland and Sweden.
- To identify differences in patient selection, procedural techniques, and outcomes using a shared registry.
- To establish a foundation for future multinational registry trials.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) for data collection.
- Prospectively collected data on coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in Iceland and Sweden over one year.
- Analyzed background, quality, and outcome parameters from all performed CA and PCI procedures.
Main Results:
- Iceland had a higher rate of CA per capita and a greater proportion of procedures for stable angina.
- Sweden showed higher utilization of fractional flow reserve and radial approach in PCI.
- Both countries demonstrated similar PCI success rates, complete revascularization rates, and low complication rates, with Iceland using drug-eluting stents more frequently.
Conclusions:
- Significant differences in interventional cardiology techniques and patient indications exist between Iceland and Sweden.
- Comparative registry data can reveal crucial variations in clinical practice.
- Findings support the potential for multinational randomized registry trials in real-world populations.
Background:
The practice of interventional cardiology differs between countries and regions. In this study we report the results of the first nation-wide long-term comparison of interventional cardiology in two countries using a common web-based registry.
Methods:
The Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) was used to prospectively and continuously collect background-, quality-, and outcome parameters for all coronary angiographies (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed in Iceland and Sweden during one year.
Results:
The rate of CA per million inhabitants was higher in Iceland than in Sweden. A higher proportion of patients had CA for stable angina in Iceland than in Sweden, while the opposite was true for ST elevation myocardial infarction. Left main stem stenosis was more commonly found in Iceland than in Sweden. The PCI rate was similar in the two countries as was the general success rate of PCI, achievement of complete revascularisation and the overall stent use. Drug eluting stents were more commonly used in Iceland (23% vs. 19%). The use of fractional flow reserve (0.2% vs. 10%) and the radial approach (0.6% vs. 33%) was more frequent in Sweden than in Iceland. Serious complications and death were very rare in both countries.
Conclusion:
By prospectively comparing interventional cardiology in two countries, using a common web based registry online, we have discovered important differences in technique and indications. A discovery such as this can lead to a change in clinical practice and inspire prospective multinational randomised registry trials in unselected, real world populations.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
