Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies
Published on: August 4, 2023
Psychology is still a problematic science and the public knows it
1York University.
Abstract:
According to the philosophers of science Hempel and Oppenheim (1948), who were cited appropriately by Lilienfeld (see record 2011-12007-001) in his article, scientific explanations serve to answer "why" questions. Clarifying the logic of explanations in the sciences, they developed famously the notion that phenomena can be explained (using deduction) by means of general laws and by means of certain antecedent conditions. What is evident from all we know from the philosophy of science is that Lilienfeld offered us an interpretation. Although Lilienfeld provided good arguments and good reasons for the explanandum (e.g., why the public is skeptical toward psychology), citing studies and data, he clearly did not provide a deductive-nomological explanation in the sense of Hempel and Oppenheim or in the sense of the natural sciences.
Related Concept Videos
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Defining Psychology
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
The Scientific Method
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Contemporary Psychology
Biopsychology
Biopsychology, also known as biological psychology or behavioral neuroscience, focuses on the biological underpinnings of behavior and mental processes. It...

