Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Qualitative Analysis03:46

Qualitative Analysis

For solutions containing mixtures of different cations, the identity of each cation can be determined by qualitative analysis. This technique involves a series of selective precipitations with different chemical reagents, each reaction producing a characteristic precipitate for a specific group of cations. Metal ions within a group are further separated by varying the pH, heating the mixture to redissolve a precipitate, or adding other reagents to form complex ions.
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis01:10

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative analysis is the process of identifying elements, ions, or compounds in an unknown sample. It is the first and most fundamental type of analysis based on the hierarchy of analytical goals. This hierarchy is significant as it provides a structured approach to scientific research, with qualitative analysis serving as the initial step, providing essential information before moving on to quantitative or other forms of analysis.
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of a mobile-based self-management program on mental health in young adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Disparities in Initial Usage of Direct-to-Patient Teledermatology: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association·2026
Same author

Leadership Behaviors and Burnout in Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study in the Veterans Health Administration.

Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives·2026
Same author

Digital Mental Health Treatments for Depression.

The Psychiatric clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Popular Online Content as a Treatment-as-Usual Control in Digital Mental Health Intervention Trials: Secondary Analysis of Two Online Randomized Controlled Trials With Repeated Measures.

JMIR mental health·2026
Same author

Haemoglobin A1c Time-In-Range and Mortality in Adults With Diabetes.

Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Between and within-site variation in qualitative implementation research.

Justin K Benzer1, Sarah Beehler, Irene E Cramer

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, Boston, MA, USA. justin.benzer@va.gov

Implementation Science : IS
|January 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Analyzing variations in perceptions across multiple sites is crucial for understanding intervention implementation. Broad sampling helps identify both within-site and between-site themes, revealing key facilitators and barriers.

More Related Videos

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Qualitative research methodology
  • Healthcare services research
  • Organizational behavior

Background:

  • Multisite qualitative studies present challenges in data collection and analysis due to within- and between-site variations.
  • Lack of consensus exists on accounting for diverse perceptions of organizational context in interventions.
  • Understanding these variations is critical for effective implementation strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze key informant perceptions across multiple sites to demonstrate the value of broad sampling.
  • To identify within-site and between-site implementation themes for interventions.
  • To inform the design of multisite implementation studies.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative case studies of four Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers implementing Primary Care/Mental Health Integration (PC/MHI).
  • Qualitative analysis of between-profession variation in referral and implementation processes.
  • Focus on within-site and between-site differences in perceptions.

Main Results:

  • Key informants identified co-location, consultation-liaison services, space, access, and referral processes as critical.
  • Within-site themes highlighted the importance of coordination, communication, and collaboration for PC/MHI.
  • Between-site themes revealed that existing mental healthcare structures influenced implementation, and inter-professional collaboration was vital for overcoming barriers.

Conclusions:

  • Variation in perceptions across sites and professions identified implementation barriers and facilitators not evident from a single perspective.
  • Analysis of variation provides insights into barriers for PC/MHI implementation.
  • Multisite studies should intentionally elicit and analyze within- and between-site variations for robust findings.