Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Preparation of a Blood Culture Pellet for Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
Published on: October 15, 2014
Reducing blood culture contamination rates in the emergency department
Andrew D Harding1, Susan Bollinger
1Southcoast Hospitals Group, New Bedford, MA, USA. adhardingrn@gmail.com
Introduction:
Routine monthly monitoring of blood culture (BC) contamination rates detected a spike (>3%) in false-positive BCs drawn in the emergency department. This triggered an ad hoc quality-improvement team to develop and implement a corrective action plan in our 230-bed urban community hospital with 58,000 ED visits annually.
Methods:
Both phlebotomists and nurses draw BCs in the emergency department; therefore all interventions were directed at both groups. These included private conversations with individual staff members associated with higher numbers of contaminated draws compared with peers, ensuring availability of necessary BC collection supplies, re-education of all phlebotomists and ED nursing staff surrounding BC collection best practices, monthly feedback to staff on BC contamination rates, and continuing private conversations as necessary, regardless of the contamination rate.
Results:
Before the spike in the emergency department, the average rate of BC contamination for the hospital as a whole was 1.82% (January-July 2011). Excluding 3 months when ED contamination was greater than 3% and the hospital contamination rate was 2.65% (August-October 2011), the average rate of BC contamination for the hospital dropped to 1.01% after the interventions (November 2011-June 2012). This represents a 44% decrease moving from 1.82% to 1.01% in hospital-wide BC contamination rates and an annualized cost avoidance of approximately $614,000.
Discussion:
The ED BC contamination rate spike occurred over a 3-month period during which the emergency department was transitioning into a new facility on the same campus. The total hospital BC contamination rate never rose above the 3% benchmark, which illustrates the importance of tracking ED-specific data.
More Related Videos
09:07Direct Microbial Identification using An Automated Microbial Identification System to Facilitate the EUCAST RAST Method Without Mass Spectrometry
Published on: May 24, 2024
08:30One-day Workflow Scheme for Bacterial Pathogen Detection and Antimicrobial Resistance Testing from Blood Cultures
Published on: July 9, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Key Techniques in Microbiology
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...