Therapeutic hypothermia after pediatric cardiac arrest trials: the vanguard phase experience and implications for

Victoria L Pemberton1, Brittan Browning, Angie Webster

  • 1Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. pembertonv@nhlbi.nih.gov

Insights

A vanguard phase for the Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest trial confirmed feasibility and patient safety, enabling successful recruitment ahead of schedule. This strategy minimized financial risks for the sponsor and proved beneficial for complex clinical trials.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric critical care research
  • Clinical trial methodology
  • Cardiovascular resuscitation

Background:

  • The Therapeutic Hypothermia after Pediatric Cardiac Arrest (THiP-CA) trial aimed to assess the efficacy of therapeutic hypothermia in children post-cardiac arrest.
  • A crucial prerequisite for continued sponsor funding was demonstrating study feasibility and patient safety through an 18-month vanguard phase.
  • Complex multicenter trials often face delays in readiness upon grant fund receipt.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and patient safety of the THiP-CA trial during an 18-month vanguard phase.
  • To determine if the vanguard phase was a prerequisite for securing continued funding from the sponsor.
  • To assess the effectiveness of a vanguard phase in preparing complex multicenter trials for full launch.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial design was employed.
  • The study involved pediatric intensive care and cardiac care units across 15 clinical sites in the US and Canada.
  • Participants included children aged 48 hours to 18 years who experienced return of circulation after cardiac arrest, comparing therapeutic hypothermia to therapeutic normothermia.

Main Results:

  • Fifteen vanguard sites were selected after obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) and subcontract approvals, with median IRB approval at 92 days and subcontracts signed at 34 days.
  • Sites screened subjects within 13 days and enrolled the first subjects within 64 days of study launch, reaching recruitment milestones four months ahead of schedule.
  • No safety concerns were identified during the vanguard phase, and overall recruitment remained on target for the ongoing trial.

Conclusions:

  • The vanguard phase of the THiP-CA trial successfully confirmed study feasibility and patient safety, proving beneficial for investigators and the funding agency.
  • The vanguard phase allowed for protocol refinement and recruitment strategy optimization, addressing common delays in complex trial launches.
  • This phased approach, including competition for vanguard positions, expedited administrative processes, minimized financial risks for the sponsor, and ensured recruitment goals were met or exceeded, suggesting its value for other complex clinical trials.
Abstract