Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Establishing a Mouse Contusion Spinal Cord Injury Model Based on a Minimally Invasive Technique
Published on: September 7, 2022
Neurological grading in traumatic spinal cord injury
Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan1, Jefferson Wilson2, Jinghao Mary Yang3
1University Health Network, Krembil Neuroscience Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physical Therapy, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Assessing neurological impairment after spinal cord injury (SCI) requires more than the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI). Combining ISNCSCI with functional outcome measures provides a comprehensive evaluation for clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Clinical Neurology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Quantifying neurological impairment in traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is crucial for patient management.
- The International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) is the current standard but lacks sensitivity and specificity for detailed clinical research.
- Existing measures are insufficient for the nuanced assessment required in clinical trials and interventional studies for the entire SCI population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review a wider array of outcome measures for assessing neurological impairment and function in traumatic SCI.
- To highlight recent advancements in sensitive outcome measures, including those previously confined to laboratory settings.
- To discuss ongoing efforts in validating and improving the clinical applicability of novel outcome measures.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of established and emerging outcome measures for traumatic SCI.
- Description of new, more sensitive neurological assessment tools.
- Discussion of validation processes and clinical integration strategies for these measures.
Main Results:
- The review identifies a range of outcome measures beyond the ISNCSCI.
- Emerging measures show potential for enhanced sensitivity in detecting neurological deficits.
- Validation efforts are underway to support the clinical adoption of these advanced tools.
Conclusions:
- Neurological impairment measures alone are insufficient for a complete understanding of patient ability after SCI.
- Integrating functional outcome measures (e.g., Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Functional Independence Measure) with neurological assessments (e.g., ISNCSCI, electrophysiologic measures) is essential.
- A combined approach is necessary for a comprehensive characterization of deficits and functional capacity in individuals with traumatic SCI.
Related Concept Videos
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction
The Spinal Cord

