Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Is cardiac resynchronization therapy an antiarrhythmic therapy for atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and
Paul L Hess1, Kevin P Jackson, Vic Hasselblad
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715, USA. p.hess@duke.edu
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) burden in some patients. However, evidence is mixed, with some studies showing benefits and others no effect on new-onset AF.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia.
- The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on AF burden is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the literature on the impact of CRT on AF burden.
- To assess the efficacy of CRT in managing AF in patients.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE.
- Studies included peer-reviewed English-language publications meeting specific MeSH headings.
- Ten observational studies and two secondary analyses of clinical trials were identified.
Main Results:
- Ten studies indicated a favorable impact of CRT on AF.
- One study found no effect of CRT on new-onset AF.
- A meta-analysis of three studies showed a 10.7% conversion rate from persistent/permanent AF to sinus rhythm with CRT.
Conclusions:
- CRT may have a beneficial effect on AF burden, particularly in persistent or permanent AF.
- Further prospective studies are needed, especially in patients not meeting traditional CRT criteria.
Abstract:
The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on atrial fibrillation (AF) burden is poorly characterized. To assess the influence of CRT on AF, we performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE using the MeSH headings "cardiac resynchronization therapy" or "cardiac pacing, artificial" and "atrial fibrillation." Selected studies were peer-reviewed and written in English. Most studies enrolled patients meeting traditional CRT criteria. Ten observational studies and two secondary analyses of clinical trials were identified. Although ten studies suggest that CRT favorably impacts AF, one secondary analysis of a clinical trial showed no effect of CRT on new-onset AF. In a meta-analysis of three studies examining the effect of CRT on persistent or permanent AF, the combined rate of conversion from persistent or permanent AF to sinus rhythm was 0.107 (95 % confidence interval 0.069-0.163). Prospective studies, particularly among patients not meeting traditional CRT criteria, are needed.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias

