Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation
07:30

Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation

Published on: July 19, 2021

Comparative evaluation of pelvic allograft selection methods.

Habib Bousleiman1, Laurent Paul, Lutz-Peter Nolte

  • 1Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014, Bern, Switzerland. habib.bousleiman@istb.unibe.ch

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|January 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Comparing bone allograft selection methods, automatic surface-based registration offers superior performance and efficiency over manual selection and volume-based registration for hemi-pelvis reconstruction.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comprehensive Performance Testing and External Validation of an AI Algorithm to Detect and Segment Brain Metastases.

Neuro-oncology·2026
Same author

Mind the gap: challenges and future directions for content-based image retrieval in clinical radiology.

Frontiers in radiology·2026
Same author

Disentangled generative uncertainty-aware multi-modal diffusion segmentation of medical images.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

[Training and Experience of Healthcare Professionals in Clinical Teaching: A Study in Primary Care in Chile].

Revista medica de Chile·2026
Same author

The Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation Challenge (ISLES)'24 Dataset: A Multimodal Stroke Imaging Dataset with Hyperacute CT, Acute Postinterventional MRI, and 3-month Clinical Outcomes.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Assessing the robustness and clinical evaluation of a deep-learning segmentation model for head and neck cancer.

Frontiers in oncology·2026

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Medical imaging

Background:

  • Accurate allograft selection is crucial for successful bone reconstruction.
  • Existing methods for matching bone grafts include manual, volume-based, and surface-based registration.
  • These methods require systematic evaluation on consistent datasets for direct comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively evaluate manual, volume-based, and surface-based registration methods for selecting hemi-pelvis allografts.
  • To assess the performance of these methods using clinically relevant criteria.
  • To identify the most efficient and accurate allograft selection technique.

Main Methods:

  • Adaptation of existing manual, volume-based, and surface-based registration algorithms for hemi-pelvis allografts.

More Related Videos

The Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model as a Tool to Study Ovarian Tissue Transplantation
05:38

The Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model as a Tool to Study Ovarian Tissue Transplantation

Published on: June 23, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation
07:30

Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation

Published on: July 19, 2021

The Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model as a Tool to Study Ovarian Tissue Transplantation
05:38

The Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane (CAM) Model as a Tool to Study Ovarian Tissue Transplantation

Published on: June 23, 2023

  • Application of methods to a dataset of whole pelves and bone fragments.
  • Evaluation based on surface distances and donor-recipient junction quality.

    • Main Results:

    • Both automatic registration methods significantly outperformed manual selection.
    • Surface-based registration demonstrated lower computational time.
    • Surface-based registration achieved greater contact surface areas between donor and recipient grafts.

    Conclusions:

    • Automatic registration methods are superior to manual selection for hemi-pelvis allograft matching.
    • Surface-based registration is the most advantageous method due to its efficiency and superior graft contact.
    • This study provides valuable insights for optimizing bone allograft selection in clinical practice.