Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
A mathematical model for maximizing the value of phase 3 drug development portfolios incorporating budget constraints
Nitin R Patel1, Suresh Ankolekar, Zoran Antonijevic
1Cytel Inc., 675 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
Abstract:
We describe a value-driven approach to optimizing pharmaceutical portfolios. Our approach incorporates inputs from research and development and commercial functions by simultaneously addressing internal and external factors. This approach differentiates itself from current practices in that it recognizes the impact of study design parameters, sample size in particular, on the portfolio value. We develop an integer programming (IP) model as the basis for Bayesian decision analysis to optimize phase 3 development portfolios using expected net present value as the criterion. We show how this framework can be used to determine optimal sample sizes and trial schedules to maximize the value of a portfolio under budget constraints. We then illustrate the remarkable flexibility of the IP model to answer a variety of 'what-if' questions that reflect situations that arise in practice. We extend the IP model to a stochastic IP model to incorporate uncertainty in the availability of drugs from earlier development phases for phase 3 development in the future. We show how to use stochastic IP to re-optimize the portfolio development strategy over time as new information accumulates and budget changes occur.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal assumptions,...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Three-Compartment Open Model
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Pharmacodynamic Models: Emax Drug–Concentration Effect Model