Pharmacoeconomic assessment of therapy for invasive aspergillosis

Me-Linh Luong1, Shahid Husain, Coleman Rotstein

  • 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Mycoses
|January 15, 2013
PubMed

Insights

Voriconazole is cost-effective for invasive aspergillosis (IA) primary treatment. Posaconazole is the most cost-effective for antifungal prophylaxis, while voriconazole and caspofungin show cost-effectiveness for empiric therapy.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Mycology
  • Health Economics
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Invasive aspergillosis (IA) significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised individuals.
  • Economic expenditures associated with invasive fungal infections (IFIs), including IA, are substantial.
  • Hospitalization duration and costs are major cost drivers, but newer oral antifungals may alter this.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review pharmacoeconomic (PE) studies on antifungal agents for invasive aspergillosis (IA).
  • To focus on primary therapy, salvage therapy, empiric therapy, and prophylaxis for IA.
  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different antifungal strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic (PE) studies.
  • Analysis of cost-effectiveness and dominance of antifungal agents.
  • Comparison of agents for primary, salvage, empiric therapy, and prophylaxis of IA.

Main Results:

  • Voriconazole is cost-effective and dominant for targeted primary treatment of IA.
  • For empiric therapy, voriconazole and caspofungin appear cost-effective over liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB).
  • Posaconazole demonstrates the highest cost-effectiveness for antifungal prophylaxis against IFIs and IA.

Conclusions:

  • Pharmacoeconomic evaluations support voriconazole for primary IA treatment.
  • Caspoofungin and voriconazole are cost-effective empiric options, while LAmB is more expensive than conventional amphotericin B.
  • Posaconazole is the preferred agent for cost-effective antifungal prophylaxis in at-risk populations.

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Fungal Phylum Ascomycota01:28

Fungal Phylum Ascomycota

Phylum Ascomycota, a major division within the subkingdom Dikarya, comprises a diverse range of fungal species, including both unicellular yeasts and filamentous molds such as Aspergillus and Penicillium. These fungi thrive in a variety of habitats, from aquatic ecosystems to terrestrial environments, playing crucial ecological and economic roles.Morphology and ReproductionThe defining characteristic of Ascomycetes, commonly referred to as sac fungi, is the ascus—a sac-like structure that...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test01:22

Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test

In clinical practice, the direct measurement of hepatic blood flow to evaluate liver function presents significant challenges due to the intricate and specialized nature of the necessary techniques. Consequently, healthcare professionals often rely on empirical estimates derived from thorough patient examinations and liver function tests to gauge liver health. Among the tools at their disposal, the Child–Pugh and MELD scoring systems stand out for their ability to categorize and assess the...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors01:29

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) is the clinical practice of measuring specific drug levels in a patient's blood or body tissues to manage and optimize therapy. TDM is crucial for drugs with narrow therapeutic windows, like warfarin and phenytoin, where incorrect doses can lead to treatment failure or severe side effects. This monitoring ensures the dosage administered is within a safe and effective range. The factors affecting therapeutic drug monitoring include:Patient-Specific Factors:a.