Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Ras Gene02:38

The Ras Gene

The Ras-gene-encoded proteins are regulators of signaling pathways controlling cell proliferation, differentiation, or cell survival. The Ras-gene family in humans constitutes three primary members—the HRas, NRas, and KRas. These genes code for four functionally distinct yet closely related proteins—the HRas, NRas, KRas4A, and KRas4B. The involvement of mutant Ras genes in human cancer was first discovered in 1982 and is among the most common causes of human tumorigenesis.
Ras is a superfamily...
Experimental RNAi02:15

Experimental RNAi

RNA interference (RNAi) is a cellular mechanism that inhibits gene expression by suppressing its transcription or activating the RNA degradation process. The mechanism was discovered by Andrew Fire and Craig Mello in 1998 in plants. Today, it is observed in almost all eukaryotes, including protozoa, flies, nematodes, insects, parasites, and mammals. This precise cellular mechanism of gene silencing has been developed into a technique that provides an efficient way to identify and determine the...
Small GTPases - Ras and Rho01:24

Small GTPases - Ras and Rho

Ras and Rho are small monomeric GTPases that act downstream of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and regulate various cellular processes. These GTPases switch between active and inactive states by binding to guanine nucleotides.
Three regulatory proteins control their activity:
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle02:36

DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle

In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle02:36

DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle

In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
Restarting Stalled Replication Forks02:37

Restarting Stalled Replication Forks

DNA replication is initiated at sites containing predefined DNA sequences known as origins of replication. DNA is unwound at these sites by the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) helicase and other factors such as Cdc45 and the associated GINS complex.The unwound single strands are protected by replication protein A (RPA) until DNA polymerase starts synthesizing DNA at the 5’ end of the strand in the same direction as the replication fork. To prevent the replication fork from falling apart, a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of FUSE-binding protein 1 as a regulatory mRNA-binding protein that represses nucleophosmin translation.

Oncogene·2010
Same author

Nucleophosmin protein expression level, but not threonine 198 phosphorylation, is essential in growth and proliferation.

Oncogene·2009
Same author

Mammalian target of rapamycin: master regulator of cell growth in the nervous system.

Histology and histopathology·2007
Same author

Renewing the debate over the p53 apoptotic response.

Cell death and differentiation·2003
Same author

Defining the molecular basis of Arf and Hdm2 interactions.

Journal of molecular biology·2001
Same author

Solution structure of the p53 regulatory domain of the p19Arf tumor suppressor protein.

Biochemistry·2001

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Induction and Diagnosis of Tumors in Drosophila Imaginal Disc Epithelia
08:14

Induction and Diagnosis of Tumors in Drosophila Imaginal Disc Epithelia

Published on: July 25, 2017

The ARF tumor-suppressor controls Drosha translation to prevent Ras-driven transformation.

M J Kuchenreuther1, J D Weber2

  • 11] BRIGHT Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA [2] Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Molecular Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.

Oncogene
|January 16, 2013
PubMed
Summary

The ARF tumor suppressor regulates Drosha protein levels by controlling its mRNA translation. Loss of ARF leads to increased Drosha, promoting cell proliferation and Ras-driven transformation.

More Related Videos

The Drosophila Imaginal Disc Tumor Model: Visualization and Quantification of Gene Expression and Tumor Invasiveness Using Genetic Mosaics
10:31

The Drosophila Imaginal Disc Tumor Model: Visualization and Quantification of Gene Expression and Tumor Invasiveness Using Genetic Mosaics

Published on: October 6, 2016

Spatio-Temporal Manipulation of Small GTPase Activity at Subcellular Level and on Timescale of Seconds in Living Cells
10:27

Spatio-Temporal Manipulation of Small GTPase Activity at Subcellular Level and on Timescale of Seconds in Living Cells

Published on: March 9, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Induction and Diagnosis of Tumors in Drosophila Imaginal Disc Epithelia
08:14

Induction and Diagnosis of Tumors in Drosophila Imaginal Disc Epithelia

Published on: July 25, 2017

The Drosophila Imaginal Disc Tumor Model: Visualization and Quantification of Gene Expression and Tumor Invasiveness Using Genetic Mosaics
10:31

The Drosophila Imaginal Disc Tumor Model: Visualization and Quantification of Gene Expression and Tumor Invasiveness Using Genetic Mosaics

Published on: October 6, 2016

Spatio-Temporal Manipulation of Small GTPase Activity at Subcellular Level and on Timescale of Seconds in Living Cells
10:27

Spatio-Temporal Manipulation of Small GTPase Activity at Subcellular Level and on Timescale of Seconds in Living Cells

Published on: March 9, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • RNA Biology

Background:

  • ARF is a tumor suppressor regulating ribosome biogenesis and sensing oncogenic stress.
  • DDX5, a microRNA (miRNA) microprocessor accessory, is a known ARF target.
  • Drosha, the catalytic core of the microprocessor complex, is essential for non-coding RNA maturation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify novel molecular targets of ARF within the miRNA microprocessor complex.
  • To investigate the impact of ARF loss on Drosha expression and function.
  • To elucidate the role of Drosha in ARF-deficient cell proliferation and transformation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Drosha protein and mRNA levels in Arf-deficient cells.
  • Investigation of Drosha mRNA translation and stability.
  • Assessment of miRNA and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) production.
  • Evaluation of cellular proliferation and oncogenic Ras(V12)-dependent transformation.

Main Results:

  • Loss of Arf significantly enhanced Drosha protein expression via increased mRNA translation, not transcription or stability.
  • Elevated Drosha levels altered a subset of miRNA expression and increased rRNA synthesis.
  • Increased Drosha was essential for maintaining proliferation and Ras(V12)-induced transformation in Arf-deficient cells.
  • Drosha knockdown inhibited Ras-dependent transformation in Arf-deficient cells.

Conclusions:

  • ARF suppresses tumor formation by regulating Drosha mRNA translation.
  • Aberrant Drosha expression contributes to uncontrolled cell proliferation and oncogenic transformation.
  • Targeting Drosha translation may offer therapeutic strategies against ARF-deficient cancers.