Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychoanalysis: the common ground.

R S Wallerstein1

  • 1Langley-Porter Institute, San Francisco, CA 94143.

The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper explores the common ground in psychoanalysis, emphasizing the shared clinical experience of transference-countertransference. It examines theoretical diversity within the discipline, advocating for unity in practice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychoanalytic research and the IPA: history, present status and future potential.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·1999
Same author

The new American psychoanalysis: a commentary.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1999
Same author

The IPA and the American Psychoanalytic Association: a perspective on the regional association agreement.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·1998
Same author

Erikson's concept of ego identity reconsidered.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1998
Same author

Research in psychodynamic psychotherapy.

The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York·1996
Same author

The identity of psychoanalysis: the question of lay analysis.

Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic·1996
Same journal

Letter from Oslo.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
Same journal

Marion Milner's foundational influence on Bion's conception of reverie and Winnicott's conception of play.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
Same journal

How to train psychoanalysts in our time? Exploring controversies around teleanalysis.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
Same journal

Gaza: another psychoanalytic perspective. Reflection on the work of Shmuel Erlich.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
Same journal

Introduction: Questions about internal, external and shared frames, types of loss, methods for scientific dialogue, and the sources of power and authority.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
Same journal

Freud, Sebald and the head of Medusa: The unconscious sense of guilt.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Psychoanalysis
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychodynamic Theory

Background:

  • Increasing theoretical diversity in psychoanalysis challenges professional unity.
  • Previous work identified the shared clinical enterprise as a common ground.
  • Responses to prior perspectives and pre-published statements inform this discussion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the common ground in psychoanalysis amidst theoretical diversity.
  • To explore the unifying elements within the psychoanalytic discipline.
  • To assess the comparative clinical presentations from the Rome Congress.

Main Methods:

  • Revisiting the concept of psychoanalytic common ground.
  • Analyzing responses to previous theoretical discussions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative assessment of three plenary clinical presentations from the Rome Congress.
  • Examining presentations from major global psychoanalytic regions and metapsychological perspectives.
  • Main Results:

    • The immediacy of the transference-countertransference interplay in clinical practice serves as a unifying element.
    • Despite theoretical differences (ego psychological, Kleinian, object relational), a shared clinical enterprise persists.
    • The Rome Congress presentations highlighted both diversity and underlying commonalities in psychoanalytic work.

    Conclusions:

    • The shared clinical encounter remains the core of psychoanalytic unity.
    • Reconciling theoretical diversity with clinical commonality is essential for the discipline's cohesion.
    • Further exploration of the transference-countertransference dynamic can strengthen psychoanalytic identity.