Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

11:51
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Fracture resistance of soft tissue level implants after cyclic loading and external modification.
Louis DiPede1, Abdulmohsin Alhashim, T K Vaidyanathan
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, New Jersey Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|January 19, 2013
Summary
Preparing implant collars for esthetic restorations weakens the abutment/implant assembly. This in vitro study found that chamfer finish line preparation significantly reduced the mean fracture load, compromising implant strength.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
- Mechanical Engineering
Background:
- Exposed implant collars in the esthetic zone present a clinical challenge in implant dentistry.
- Preparation of the implant collar to accommodate restorative materials can compromise abutment/implant assembly strength.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of preparing a 0.5-mm chamfer finish line on implant collars at varying apical depths on the failure load.
- To determine the mechanical consequences of implant collar modification for esthetic zone restorations.
Main Methods:
- Thirty solid abutments and 30 implants were tested in vitro at a 30-degree angle.
- Groups included an intact control (IN), 0.5-mm chamfer preparation 1 mm apical (P1), and 2 mm apical (P2) to the implant/abutment interface.
- Specimens underwent fatigue loading followed by load-to-failure testing, with mean fracture load (MFL) analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in MFL were observed between the intact group and both preparation groups (P<.001).
- The intact group (IN) had a mean fracture load of 3825 N.
- Prepared groups P1 (2944 N) and P2 (2553 N) exhibited significantly lower mean fracture loads.
Conclusions:
- Implant collar preparation, even with a 0.5-mm chamfer, significantly decreases the mean load required to fracture the abutment/implant assembly.
- The extent of preparation influences the reduction in fracture strength, with deeper preparation leading to lower MFL.
- These findings highlight the mechanical trade-offs associated with esthetic implant collar management.

