Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Separation of Sister Chromatids02:17

Separation of Sister Chromatids

At the transition from prophase to metaphase, there is a reduction in cohesion along the chromosomal arms, resulting in the resolution of sister chromatids. However, residual cohesin connections remain to hold the sister chromatids together until the transition from metaphase to anaphase. The residual connection prevents any premature separation of sister chromatids, blocking the risks of aneuploidy within the daughter cells.
At the onset of anaphase, separase, a proteolytic enzyme, is...
Negative Regulator Molecules01:23

Negative Regulator Molecules

Positive regulators allow a cell to advance through cell cycle checkpoints. Negative regulators have an equally important role as they terminate a cell’s progression through the cell cycle—or pause it—until the cell meets specific criteria.
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway01:22

PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway

The mammalian target of rapamycin  (mTOR) is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates growth, proliferation, and cell survival in response to hormones, growth factors, or nutrient availability. This kinase exists in two structurally and functionally distinct forms: mTOR complex 1  (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2  (mTORC2). The first form (mTORC1) is composed of a rapamycin-sensitive Raptor and proline-rich Akt substrate, PRAS40. In contrast,  mTORC2 consists of a rapamycin-insensitive companion...
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators02:04

Covalently Linked Protein Regulators

Proteins can undergo many types of post-translational modifications, often in response to changes in their environment. These modifications play an important role in the function and stability of these proteins. Covalently linked molecules include functional groups, such as methyl, acetyl, and phosphate groups, and also small proteins, such as ubiquitin. There are around 200 different types of covalent regulators that have been identified.
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein.
Attachment of Sister Chromatids02:57

Attachment of Sister Chromatids

As cells progress into mitosis, the nuclear envelope breaks down, and the condensed chromosomes are exposed to the array of bipolar microtubules of the mitotic spindle. The kinetochore, a large, disc-shaped protein complex, is present at the centromere region of the sister chromatids and acts as a binding site for the microtubules.  Usually, the plus-end of a single microtubule is embedded within the kinetochore. However, some kinetochores first establish lateral contact with the side-wall of a...
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis02:15

M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis

Checkpoints throughout the cell cycle serve as safeguards and gatekeepers, allowing the cell cycle to progress in favorable conditions and slow or halt it in problematic ones. This regulation is known as the cell cycle control system.
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dual pH/Redox-Responsive Mixed Polymeric Micelles for Anticancer Drug Delivery and Controlled Release.

Pharmaceutics·2019
Same author

Measurement of Dioxin Emissions from a Small-Scale Waste Incinerator in the Absence of Air Pollution Controls.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2019
Same author

Synthesis of Humin-Phenol-Formaldehyde Adhesive.

Polymers·2019
Same author

Comparison of Satellite Sign and Island Sign in Predicting Hematoma Growth and Poor Outcome in Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

World neurosurgery·2019
Same author

A genetic variation in the CpG island of pseudogene GBAP1 promoter is associated with gastric cancer susceptibility.

Cancer·2019
Same author

Upregulation of FoxP4 in HCC promotes migration and invasion through regulation of EMT.

Oncology letters·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach to Identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatases and their Interactors
10:17

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach to Identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatases and their Interactors

Published on: April 29, 2022

Direct binding between BubR1 and B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes regulate mitotic progression.

Thomas Kruse1, Gang Zhang, Marie Sofie Yoo Larsen

  • 1The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3b, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Journal of Cell Science
|January 25, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how BubR1, a key protein in cell division, interacts with phosphatase complexes to regulate mitosis. BubR1 is known to stabilize chromosome attachments, but the mechanism was unclear. Researchers found that BubR1 binds to B56 subunits of PP2A phosphatase through a phosphorylated motif. Two hydrophobic residues around serine 670 are crucial for this interaction. Mutating these residues disrupts metaphase plate formation and delays mitosis. Phosphorylation of serines 670 and 676 enhances B56 binding and recruits phosphatases to kinetochores. The findings suggest that BubR1 recruits B56-PP2A to counteract Aurora B kinase activity at improperly attached kinetochores.

Keywords:
BubR1 functionPP2A regulatory subunitsMitotic checkpoint mechanismPhosphorylation in cell division

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Combining Mitotic Cell Synchronization and High Resolution Confocal Microscopy to Study the Role of Multifunctional Cell Cycle Proteins During Mitosis
08:33

Combining Mitotic Cell Synchronization and High Resolution Confocal Microscopy to Study the Role of Multifunctional Cell Cycle Proteins During Mitosis

Published on: December 5, 2017

Manipulation and Analysis of Cell Cycle-Dependent Processes in Budding Yeast
08:13

Manipulation and Analysis of Cell Cycle-Dependent Processes in Budding Yeast

Published on: September 26, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach to Identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatases and their Interactors
10:17

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach to Identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatases and their Interactors

Published on: April 29, 2022

Combining Mitotic Cell Synchronization and High Resolution Confocal Microscopy to Study the Role of Multifunctional Cell Cycle Proteins During Mitosis
08:33

Combining Mitotic Cell Synchronization and High Resolution Confocal Microscopy to Study the Role of Multifunctional Cell Cycle Proteins During Mitosis

Published on: December 5, 2017

Manipulation and Analysis of Cell Cycle-Dependent Processes in Budding Yeast
08:13

Manipulation and Analysis of Cell Cycle-Dependent Processes in Budding Yeast

Published on: September 26, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cell cycle regulation in molecular biology
  • Mitotic checkpoint mechanisms in cancer research
  • Protein phosphorylation in biochemistry

Background:

Mitotic progression is tightly regulated to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) prevents anaphase onset until all chromosomes are properly attached to spindle microtubules. BubR1 is a key SAC component that also stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule interactions. Prior research has shown that BubR1 inhibits Aurora B kinase activity, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. This gap motivated the investigation of BubR1's interaction with phosphatases. No prior work had resolved how BubR1 recruits phosphatases to counteract Aurora B. This uncertainty drove the current study to explore BubR1's binding partners. Researchers propose that phosphatases may regulate Aurora B activity at kinetochores. The SAC's role in cell division is well established, but its phosphatase interactions are less understood. This paper addresses the mechanism of BubR1's phosphatase recruitment during mitosis.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to clarify how BubR1 regulates Aurora B activity during mitosis. The specific problem is the lack of understanding regarding BubR1's phosphatase recruitment. Researchers sought to determine if BubR1 interacts with B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes. The motivation stems from the known role of BubR1 in stabilizing kinetochore attachments. The authors propose that BubR1 recruits phosphatases to counteract Aurora B. This hypothesis is based on prior observations of BubR1's dual functions. The goal was to identify the molecular mechanism of BubR1-phosphatase interaction. This work could provide insight into mitotic regulation and SAC function.

Main Methods:

The researchers used biochemical assays to test BubR1's interaction with B56 subunits. They employed site-directed mutagenesis to alter conserved residues in BubR1. Phosphorylation status was analyzed using kinase inhibitors and phospho-specific antibodies. Binding assays confirmed the direct interaction between BubR1 and B56. Fluorescence microscopy tracked B56 localization to kinetochores. Cell cycle progression was assessed using time-lapse imaging. Metaphase plate formation was evaluated in mutant cells. The study combined molecular biology and cell imaging techniques.

Main Results:

BubR1 directly binds to B56 subunits through a conserved motif. The binding motif is phosphorylated by Cdk1 and Plk1 kinases. Two hydrophobic residues around serine 670 are essential for B56 binding. Mutation of these residues disrupts metaphase plate formation. Cells with mutated residues delay in mitosis, suggesting functional importance. Phosphorylation of serines 670 and 676 enhances B56 binding to BubR1. BubR1 recruits B56 to kinetochores, as shown by fluorescence imaging. These findings suggest that BubR1 targets B56 to counteract Aurora B activity.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that BubR1 recruits B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes to kinetochores. This recruitment may counteract Aurora B kinase activity at improperly attached kinetochores. The conserved motif in BubR1 is phosphorylated by Cdk1 and Plk1. These phosphorylations are necessary for B56 binding and mitotic progression. The two hydrophobic residues around serine 670 are critical for B56 interaction. Mutation of these residues disrupts metaphase plate formation and delays mitosis. The study suggests a mechanism by which BubR1 stabilizes kinetochore attachments. These findings provide new insights into the regulation of mitotic checkpoints.

BubR1 binds to B56 subunits through a conserved motif phosphorylated by Cdk1 and Plk1.

Serine 670 is phosphorylated by Cdk1 and Plk1, which is required for B56 binding.

These residues are essential for B56 binding and metaphase plate formation.

Mutation disrupts metaphase plate formation and delays cells in mitosis.

Phosphorylation enhances B56 binding to BubR1 and recruits it to kinetochores.

BubR1 recruits B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes to counteract Aurora B activity at kinetochores.