Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Long-term prognostic value of restitution slope in patients with ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathies
Marc Dorenkamp1, Andreas J Morguet, Christian Sticherling
1Department of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany. marc.dorenkamp@charite.de
Insights
Neither action potential duration restitution slope nor effective refractory period/APD ratios predict long-term outcomes in cardiomyopathy patients. Programmed ventricular stimulation, however, strongly predicted patient prognosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- The restitution hypothesis suggests steep action potential duration (APD) restitution slopes predict malignant ventricular arrhythmias.
- Patients with ischemic (ICM) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) are at risk for such arrhythmias.
- Evaluating APD restitution slope and effective refractory period (ERP)/APD ratio for prognostic value is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the restitution hypothesis in patients with ICM and DCM.
- To determine the long-term prognostic value of ventricular APD restitution slope and ERP/APD ratio.
- To compare these parameters with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) for predicting patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Monophasic action potentials were recorded in 74 patients (32 ICM, 42 DCM) during routine PVS.
- APD and ERP were measured at baseline and with increasing extrastimuli (S2-S4).
- APD restitution slope and ERP/APD ratios were calculated; long-term outcomes (mortality/ICD shock) were tracked over 6.1 years.
Main Results:
- Neither APD restitution slope nor ERP/APD ratios predicted the combined endpoint of mortality or ICD shock.
- Increasing extrastimuli did not significantly steepen the APD restitution slope.
- ERP/APD ratios decreased with additional extrastimuli (p=0.03 for S1 vs. S3).
- Positive PVS results were strongly predictive of adverse outcomes (p=0.006).
Conclusions:
- Ventricular APD restitution slope and ERP/APD ratios do not predict long-term outcomes in patients with ICM or DCM.
- Programmed ventricular stimulation is a significant predictor of prognosis in these patient groups.
- The findings challenge the direct prognostic utility of the restitution hypothesis in this population.
Background:
An action potential duration (APD) restitution curve with a steep slope ≥1 has been associated with increased susceptibility for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. We aimed to evaluate the "restitution hypothesis" and tested ventricular APD restitution slope as well as effective refractory period (ERP)/APD ratio for long-term prognostic value in patients with ischemic (ICM) or dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).
Methodology/Principal Findings:
Monophasic action potentials were recorded in patients with ICM (n = 32) and DCM (n = 42) undergoing routine programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 32±7% and 28±9%, respectively. APD and ERP were measured at baseline stimulation (S(1)) and upon introduction of one to three extrastimuli (S(2)-S(4)). ERP/APD ratios and the APD restitution curve were calculated and the maximum restitution slope was determined. After a mean follow-up of 6.1±3.0 years, the combined end-point of mortality and and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock was not predicted by restitution slope or ERP/APD ratios. Comparing S(2) vs. S(3) vs. S(4) extrastimuli for restitution slope (1.5±0.6 vs. 1.4±0.4 vs. 1.3±0.5; p = NS), additional extrastimuli did not lead to a steepening restitution slope. ERP/APD ratio decreased with additional extrastimuli (0.98±0.09 [S(1)] vs. 0.97±0.10 [S(2)] vs. 0.93±0.11 [S(3)]; p = 0.03 S(1) vs. S(3)). Positive PVS was strongly predictive of outcome (p = 0.006).
Conclusions/Significance:
Neither ventricular APD restitution slope nor ERP/APD ratios predict outcome in patients with ICM or DCM.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
