Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Introduction01:13

Gas Chromatography: Introduction

Gas chromatography (GC) is a technique for separating and analyzing volatile compounds in a sample. Its primary purpose is to identify and quantify components in complex mixtures, making it essential in fields such as environmental analysis, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals. GC is also called vapor-phase chromatography (VPC) or gas-liquid partition chromatography (GLPC).
In GC,  a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a column.
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall. The coating...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases01:17

Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases

Gas chromatography (GC) relies on stationary phases to separate and analyze components in a sample. There are two main types of stationary phases: liquid and solid. Liquid stationary phases are non-volatile, thermally stable, and chemically inert liquids coated onto the column. Solid stationary phases are particles of adsorbent material, such as silica gel or molecular sieves.
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a Direct Sampling Module for Compact Capillary Liquid Chromatography.

Journal of separation science·2025
Same author

Altered adrenal and gonadal steroids biosynthesis in patients with burn injury.

Clinical mass spectrometry (Del Mar, Calif.)·2024
Same author

Modeling transthyretin (TTR) amyloid diseases, from monomer to amyloid fibrils.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Exploring Biopharmaceutical Analysis with Compact Capillary Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation.

LC GC Europe·2023
Same author

Column selection considerations in compact capillary liquid chromatography.

Journal of chromatography. A·2023
Same author

Online Monitoring of Small Volume Reactions Using Compact Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation.

Separation science plus·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

Peak sweeping and gating using thermal gradient gas chromatography.

Jesse A Contreras1, Alan L Rockwood, H Dennis Tolley

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

Journal of Chromatography. A
|January 29, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Thermal gradient gas chromatography (TGGC) offers precise control over sample component movement and elution. This technique provides narrower peaks and higher signal-to-noise ratios compared to traditional methods.

More Related Videos

Capturing Actively Produced Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds from Human-Associated Samples with Vacuum-Assisted Sorbent Extraction
09:19

Capturing Actively Produced Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds from Human-Associated Samples with Vacuum-Assisted Sorbent Extraction

Published on: June 1, 2022

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

Capturing Actively Produced Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds from Human-Associated Samples with Vacuum-Assisted Sorbent Extraction
09:19

Capturing Actively Produced Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds from Human-Associated Samples with Vacuum-Assisted Sorbent Extraction

Published on: June 1, 2022

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry
11:44

Qualitative Characterization of the Aqueous Fraction from Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae Using 2D Gas Chromatography with Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Published on: March 6, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Chromatography

Background:

  • Gas chromatography (GC) traditionally uses isothermal or temperature-programmed conditions.
  • Controlling temperature gradients along the column offers unique separation possibilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate and evaluate a thermal gradient gas chromatography (TGGC) method.
  • To compare TGGC performance against isothermal GC (ITGC) and temperature programmed GC (TPGC).

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of TGGC using a laboratory apparatus with resistive heating and convective cooling.
  • Experimental comparison of peak capacity production rates between ITGC, TPGC, and TGGC.
  • Evaluation of peak shape, signal-to-noise ratio, band broadening, and peak tailing.

Main Results:

  • TGGC demonstrated performance comparable to TPGC in terms of peak capacity (469 min⁻¹ vs 381 min⁻¹).
  • TGGC achieved narrower peaks and higher signal-to-noise ratios.
  • The method effectively minimized band broadening and peak tailing.
  • Rapid heating (4000°C/min) and cooling (3500°C/min) enabled selective separation via peak gating.

Conclusions:

  • TGGC provides enhanced separation performance in gas chromatography.
  • The technique offers advantages in peak shape, signal quality, and reduction of chromatographic artifacts.
  • Rapid thermal cycling in TGGC allows for selective separation without compromising resolution.