Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

13:44
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
A New GLLD Operator for Mass Detection in Digital Mammograms.
N Gargouri1, A Dammak Masmoudi, D Sellami Masmoudi
1Computer Imaging and Electronic System Group, CEM Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering, Sfax Engineering School, University of Sfax, P.O. Box 1169, 3038 Sfax, Tunisia.
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
|February 1, 2013
Summary
This study introduces a novel Gray Level and Local Difference (GLLD) method for improved mass detection in mammograms. This computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) approach achieves high accuracy, outperforming existing methods.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Computer-Aided Diagnosis
- Machine Learning
Background:
- Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are crucial for analyzing digital mammograms.
- Accurate detection of masses in mammograms remains a significant challenge in breast cancer screening.
- Existing texture analysis methods like Local Binary Patterns (LBP) have limitations in modeling complex mass textures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an efficient methodology for enhanced mass detection in digital mammograms.
- To introduce a new local feature extraction model, Gray Level and Local Difference (GLLD), for improved texture analysis.
- To evaluate the performance of machine learning classifiers, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), for mass classification.
Main Methods:
- Proposed a novel Gray Level and Local Difference (GLLD) feature extraction technique, incorporating absolute gray level values and local differences.
- Utilized ANNs, SVM, and kNN classifiers to distinguish between malignant masses and non-masses.
- Evaluated the methodology using 1000 regions of interest (ROIs) from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM).
Main Results:
- The GLLD method demonstrated superior performance in mass detection compared to traditional texture operators.
- Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) exhibited the best classification performance among the tested algorithms.
- Achieved a high area under the curve (A(z)) of 0.95 for the mass detection step.
Conclusions:
- The proposed GLLD feature extraction model significantly improves mass detection accuracy in digital mammograms.
- The GLLD approach, particularly when combined with ANNs, offers a robust solution for computer-aided diagnosis.
- This methodology represents a promising advancement for enhancing the early detection of breast cancer.

