Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From complexity to clarity: aging bone marrow niche in bone and blood regeneration and malignancy.

Bone research·2026
Same author

Myoblast Therapy Ameliorates Skeletal Muscle Atrophy Resulting From Chronic Denervation.

Muscle & nerve·2026
Same author

Design and Synthesis of Peptide-Polyester Conjugates for Cell-Mediated Scaffold Degradation.

Advanced healthcare materials·2026
Same author

Sensorineural regulation of skull healing implicates FGF1 signaling in non-healing bone.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Engineering bone from fat: a review of the<i>in vivo</i>mechanisms of adipose derived stem cell-mediated bone regeneration.

Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)·2025
Same author

Design and Synthesis of Peptide-Polyester Conjugates for Cell-Mediated Scaffold Degradation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

ITGA1 promotes osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells via FAK-mediated PI3K-Akt activation.

Stem cell research & therapy·2026
Same journal

Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived apoptotic vesicles in liver fibrosis: targeting the IGFBP3/PI3K-AKT axis via miR-409-3p.

Stem cell research & therapy·2026
Same journal

SERINC3 promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs via IL-32/AMPK-mediated autophagy and mitochondrial energy metabolism.

Stem cell research & therapy·2026
Same journal

DLP bioprinting of cartilage organoid-laden bioinks yields high-fidelity auricular constructs with enhanced chondrogenesis.

Stem cell research & therapy·2026
Same journal

Adipose-derived stem cells-conditioned medium (ADMSCs-CM) improves testicular function and sperm DNA damage via Nrf2 antioxidant signaling pathways in rat unilateral varicocele.

Stem cell research & therapy·2026
Same journal

PDLSC-CM targets HAPLN1 in macrophages to reduce root resorption in delayed replanted teeth.

Stem cell research & therapy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

Site-Directed Immobilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 to Solid Surfaces by Click Chemistry
11:20

Site-Directed Immobilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 to Solid Surfaces by Click Chemistry

Published on: March 29, 2018

Mechanical control of tissue-engineered bone.

Ben P Hung, Daphne L Hutton, Warren L Grayson

    Stem Cell Research & Therapy
    |February 2, 2013
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Mechanical forces significantly impact bone development and engineered bone grafts. Understanding these physical cues, like shear stress and nanotopography, is crucial for improving bone tissue engineering outcomes.

    More Related Videos

    Design of a Biaxial Mechanical Loading Bioreactor for Tissue Engineering
    08:04

    Design of a Biaxial Mechanical Loading Bioreactor for Tissue Engineering

    Published on: April 25, 2013

    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
    11:51

    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

    Published on: February 10, 2014

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 14, 2026

    Site-Directed Immobilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 to Solid Surfaces by Click Chemistry
    11:20

    Site-Directed Immobilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 to Solid Surfaces by Click Chemistry

    Published on: March 29, 2018

    Design of a Biaxial Mechanical Loading Bioreactor for Tissue Engineering
    08:04

    Design of a Biaxial Mechanical Loading Bioreactor for Tissue Engineering

    Published on: April 25, 2013

    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
    11:51

    An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

    Published on: February 10, 2014

    Area of Science:

    • Biomaterials Science
    • Cell Biology
    • Tissue Engineering

    Background:

    • Bone structure and function are critically influenced by mechanical forces.
    • Osteoprogenitor cells respond to biophysical stimuli, affecting bone formation.
    • Understanding native bone cell mechanical exposure informs tissue engineering strategies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the osteo-inductive effects of mechanical cues on bone cells in vitro.
    • To examine the impact of shear stress, substrate rigidity, and nanotopography on engineered bone.
    • To address time-dependent effects of mechanical cues on vascularization and bone formation in vivo.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of studies on mechanical cues (shear stress, substrate rigidity, nanotopography) in vitro.
    • Analysis of cellular responses in monolayer and 3D scaffolds.
    • Investigation of in vivo vascular infiltration and bone formation in response to mechanical cues.

    Main Results:

    • Mechanical cues like shear stress, substrate rigidity, and nanotopography stimulate osteogenic phenotypes.
    • These forces influence matrix deposition, mineralization, and tissue organization in engineered bone.
    • Time-dependent mechanical stimulation affects vascular infiltration and de novo bone formation in vivo.

    Conclusions:

    • Mechanistic understanding of mechanical cues is vital for rational design in bone tissue engineering.
    • Advanced biomaterials and bioreactors provide insights into controlling cellular fate and tissue properties.
    • Optimizing mechanical stimuli can enhance the functional outcomes of engineered bone grafts.